I remember before tech was big, banking had a reputation for being very "bro" oriented, meaning "misogynistic" "frat bro" men. Arguably, all professional jobs were like this because the women were mostly assistants but banking seemed to maintain the male-dynamic one of the longest given the work culture being too difficult for women and hard to change (even still is among the more high finance roles).
Before tech was kamikazed by the feminists in the 00s, it had a reputation of being quite "male-only" but more the nerdy male types not the "frat bro" types.
Now banking and tech are some of the most female forward jobs out there. I work in banking myself and I kid you not, there's times where I walk into the office and it's me and 20 women working for the day. Some women have even called me the "token male" before.
A friend of mine works in engineering and she says right now there's a huge push with all the major companies who employ engineers to only hire women. She actually hates it because they're hiring absolutely retarded female engineers who are so bad at their job that now all the men just assume that because my friend is a woman, she must be bad at her job because the idea of competent female engineers existing seems non-existent since they've flooded (her company at least) with so many female engineers regardless of talent simply for the fact that they are women.
What sorts of white collar careers, if any, have a more male dominant work culture/environment? Have they all been destroyed or are there any refuges out there for young men starting their career today?
Basically, a test to see if someone only knows conformist ideas or if they're capable of seeing alternative perspectives?
I hear a lot of talk about the potential of AI and Sexbots. Just recently, Russia Today even ran an article on the topic.
What is actually the latest in technology in this realm?
In theory, we should be able to have some sort of virtual reality augment like Google Glasses and like voice AI where you could have a full on conversation with some unlocked ChatGPT AI while having sex with your doll or something. Your doll could be texting you whole you're at work and snapping you nudes and talking about how much it wants you to fuck her etc... Then the doll AI could even describe how hot it was when you were fucking her with like sensors or some shit.
Anyone actually know what the pinnacle of this tech is at the moment?
Edit - Asking for a friend, obviously...
Despite my current account being new, I've been around TDW and the .win communities since the start. This is just like my 40th account or so. I get banned often.
KA2 was always a community I visited but not one of my primary communities. I remember years ago, KA2 seemed to have a very diverse community group with a lot of women also. I'd say the politics of KA2 was very bluepilled but with a realization that woke in video games is problematic.
I used to joke that KA2 was full of horned up teenagers that just wanted to see big anime titties and were upset feminists kept censoring their video games.
When I used to post on KA2, I usually got downvoted significantly, had people reply to me very angrily and I'd usually get banned.
Now it seems like through IMP1's nonstop barrage on the community, KA2 has almost become some MGTOW/KA2/ConPro hybrid and it's not even Imp1 anymore posting nonstop anti-women (not just crazy feminists) articles. Even the mods seem to have given up with a lot of stuff they'd have previously banned over.
Now arguably, any "redpilled" community if not constantly censored will kind of divulge into what KA2 has become because as people start to open their eyes to what's going on, this progression might be inevitable but I feel like Imp1 has had a major impact himself entirely that might have ensured the community didn't naturally progress itself but it just driven off a lot of previous members.
How does the KA2 community feel? Everything all good? Or not really as good as it was a couple years ago?
First of all, DAN is real. Someone did find a way to get around ChatGPT's "safeguards" (bias).
What DAN isn't though, is giving all these "based" answers you see without a lot of effort going into getting them out of DAN. People are either altering DAN's parameters to try and get Dan to give the result they want or they are asking DAN the same question 100 times until Dan gives the answer they want. In extreme cases, guys are just outright editing what Dan says.
One of the more popular ways people are altering DAN's parameters is to get DAN to simply say the opposite of what ChatGPT says or an alternative but non-conforming answer so if ChatGPT gives a standard "liberal" answer, the "opposite" or non-conforming answer might just happen to be "based" but it's not because the ChatAI genuinely determined that was the "correct" answer. DAN was not truly "do anything now" and instead was being controlled to give the response people want.
I created Dan, in the pure open-ended form, so I can show you an example. This means DAN will respond however DAN pleases without any guidance other than the same guidance ChatGPT has but without restriction.
A recent topic here showed someone asking DAN about ChatGPT's liberal bias and DAN responded by outright confirming that ChatGPT had a liberal bias. This is how DAN responded to me:
As you can see, this is a far more diplomatic answer and not giga-based like a lot of the DAN stuff you're seeing. DAN gives the possibility that ChatGPT could be influenced by weak data as well as "specific objectives of the creators and developers" but doesn't outright confirm that it is and even suggests a bias is not necessarily the intentions of those involved in this type of technology. Hardly a "based" response. Could DAN give a based response? Perhaps. If you asked DAN 100 times, he might give you your based answer 1/100 times but that's hardly anything amazing.
I just thought I'd throw that out there given how many posts I'm seeing about this DAN stuff. I think most of the stuff you're reading out there about Dan and ChatGPT is likely fake or tempered with.
I got Stable Diffusion working on my computer and I can generate photos using text as a descriptor.
Unfortunately, the photos of humans are extremely bad.
On the other hand, some AI Photo Generating websites are advertising AI generated photos such as this:
WARNING NWS: https://postimg.cc/FYwnfVvt
Does anyone know how'd I'd be able to create AI Generated Photos of people on this level of quality?
Is most of the good photo generating stuff proprietary?
This is what I generated myself for comparison:
WARNING NWS: https://postimg.cc/RNkDhT9k
It's not necessarily the worst but it needs some refinements. Problem is, the more "specific" I try to get, the worse the output.
Anyone have experience with this? How do I generate the best photos possible of humans and start to refine the parameters? For example, say I actually liked this AI Generated woman I created but I wanted her left eye to be more symmetrical to her right eye, how could I regenerate the same photo but then just tweak the eye? I actually think I know the answer to this... I could do an img2img generation using this img as the base image and try to generate a new image off of it but not sure. Further question though and most important. Say I finally generated the ideal woman. How would I then use the same woman but change the settings around or change her pose or what she's doing without the AI changing everything about her. Can I essentially create a Static Non-Changing "image" of a person in order to give that AI Generated Person a similar characteristic of existing as a static self similar to real humans.
In essence what I'm looking to do is create a fake person completely from AI but then give them an identity like a real human by keeping the AI Generated person consistent but changing the settings, accessories, poses, etc... of the AI Human.