No, im disappointed that the savior of mankind, in the book most oriented towards “the future”, tells us about “them of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but do lie”, and you can’t see the forest in front of you because you’ve smashed your face into the tree named “ulla”
You love to preach the multiple meanings folded into Jesus’ words…well, except when it comes to anything related to the genocidal state of israel
no explanation of how his special jewdar works, but still sent 20,000 words overnight
Brool Story Co.
minor family emergency
Hope all is well
Jesus says twice they are not Jews. I don't know why it's so hard for followers of Jesus to hear Jesus say they are not Jews and to tell him they are Jews. Too much Scofield interpretation going on, methinks, self-deprecating.
Hey doofus, He also says “they say they are jews” - so until you can explain to the class your special jewdar which lets you tell “the good jews” from “those who say they are jews but are not and do lie”, save your self-righteous indignation and gaslighting for zionist summer camp
Wow. Interesting. And how would you feel if you hadn’t had breakfast this morning?
Which part couldn’t you grok?
Judaism died and was resurrected ~2,000 years ago. We’re talking about Rabbinical Judaism which was born ~400 years later in Babylon. It’s logical that you would attempt to conflate the two, as that’s the only way for a lie to survive, by being conflated with the truth by the willfully ignorant.
How much more formal does it get than being present in your group’s founding document? By your logic America never formally rejected the monarchy. Get your head out of your ass.
Does it get any more un-american than subverting the first amendment? I suppose we could look to the same force’s subversion of Christianity, the logical underpinning of the Bill Of Rights…
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/19BtBuJbWP/how-does-deuteronomy-28-not-comp/c
“Greatest ally” my ass
Jews haven't formally denounced Jesus as Messiah.
You shouldn’t lie:
On the eve of Passover, Jesus the Nazarene was hanged and a herald went forth before him forty days heralding, "Jesus the Nazarene is going forth to be stoned because he practiced sorcery and instigated and seduced Israel to idolatry. Whoever knows anything in defense may come and state it." But since they did not find anything in his defense they hanged him on the eve of Passover.
”the synagogue of Satan is actually the goyim!!!”
This is your brain on zionism
Begun, the Clone War has
But how to account for “Christian” zionism - or rather, how to show the hoodwinked masses the reality of things?
I struggle to think of movies not made by liberal New York City jews to a major extent, but I still manage to enjoy the odd one lol
Your trepidation is fair enough, probably even earned, while at the same time A24 are one of the few sources of interesting movies these days imo
Just watched it last night. Again I don’t want to spoil anything so I’m trying to avoid specifics. Due to when and what’s being depicted, obviously the movie contains wokeness (aka harpy white women screeching about the oppression of blacks to a black cop, masking and social distancing and all the other memes of the era), without (imo) “picking a side”.
To encapsulate what I mean, there is a hilarious scene where a white lad is explaining to his white parents about “dismantling whiteness” (which he just “learned” about that afternoon to further his pursuit of pussy) - and his dad just hits him flat with the ol’:
“Are you fucking retarded? You’re White.”
Ah, found it:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=keX7m50zfuI&pp=ygUfRWRkaW5ndG9uIHdoYXQgYXJlIHlvdSByZXRhcmRlZA%3D%3D
Are you saying that for any reason other than having watched the Wyatt Stagg video?
I don’t think there was a single non-white character in this movie, unless you count one middle eastern looking zombie
When I first heard about “mutant” zombies, in the pre-release buzz, I thought it sounded retarded. When I saw the first “mutant” zombies in the movie i thought it was a bad sign for the rest of the movie. But, looking at things more holistically I enjoyed it for two main reasons:
-The first movie already turned the image of the stereotypical zombie on its head by inventing zombies that sprint like Ethiopians chasing a gazelle. A decade or two later it’s easy to forget how revolutionary that was.
-Further to the last point, these never were zombies in the first place. They’ve never been the immortal, re-animated dead. They’ve always just been sick humans, we even saw them starving to death at the end of Days
It’s kind of one of the core themes of the movie : (Spoilers)
.
.
.
.
The dad tells the son “Thet have no mind. They have no soul.” when trying to get him acclimated to killing them without remorse (“the more you do it the easier it gets.”). Then in the next act, we see almost the exact opposite, the scene with the mother in the train. The doctor says he builds his tower with the bones of human and infected alike, “because they are alike.”
Not to say you didn’t get that about the film, just that in that light I don’t have as much issue with their approach as I thought I was going to. There’s also two more movies to see how they “evolve” (heh, sorry) this plot line
It was definitely quite a “video-gamey” choice, making the universe more like Resident Evil or The Last of Us than the classic Romero take.
I’ll echo some of your sentiments, indeed the camera work during the action scenes can be a bit jarring - it sometimes feels like a “kill-cam” in a video game, and the main thing it felt like this movie was missing (to me) was the fantastic music/sound design of the first one. The sound design holds up pretty well but boy was I missing the score (mainly the piano) from Days.
The world opens up quite a bit as the movie progresses. I hope you share your thoughts when you’re done! I was also impressed by Aaron Taylor-Johnson’s acting (frankly all the characters are well acted!).
Forgive the tangent (ignore it if you want! lol) but do you often not watch a whole movie in one sitting? I feel like that would get in the way of the experience!
Hes coming back for the 3rd one, but this lady Nia DaCosta is doing the 2nd one
It seems he's fairly involved so it’s (hopefully) not going to be a repeat of the Star Wars sequel trilogy, aka vision-less slop
It’s the word “good” next to a homonym of the word “genes”. You see, this is highly problematic because it normalizes the concept of “bad” genes, such as the type which might result in a minuscule portion of the population (let’s say 13% but it’s really closer to 3%) committing 60% of the violent crime
Eu-Genic (i.e. “eugenics”) literally translates to “good genes”
I’ve still gotta watch the second half, but yeah I agree with your take on his take lol. It was a very refreshing conversation because it basically skipped all the bs preamble that tends to bog down the discussion
Agreed - just the other day I saw someone post a 6 year old reddit post to bitch about it. Like…get a fucking grip
Wait is the OP of the tweet just some faggot nobody? I see now hes got just 1k followers lol
This is why I hate when faggot nobodies get their opinions broadcast like this, im deceived into thinking their opinion has any value whatsoever, even for a moment
Interesting. I had never really heard of this Dave Smith guy until he became a topic of contention in the recent Owens/Fuentes interview (I know he was part of that Rogan debate but ignored the whole thing because everyone should already know Douglas Murray was a faggot by now). This looks like solid confirmation for Fuente’s opinion of him, that he's a limited hangout and useful idiot (at best)
It’s a weird world where the Hitler fans have more empathy for strangers than their opponents
Feel free to elaborate on the word “verify” and how it differs from “take people at their word, full stop”
Sounds like he has his head on straighter than you!
You mean, beyond the fact that ashkenazim aren’t Judahites, as you just acknowledged?