1
Citizen_of_Amalek 1 point ago +1 / -0

remember seeing a bunch of women circle jerking about how men's requirements eliminate all but 20% or so of women. The hilarious part is women's requirements left a fraction of a percent of men. But somehow men are the picky ones.

what men find physically attractive in a woman varries much more than what women find attractive in men. No women like short men, no women like skinny [scrawny] men, no women like pudgy/dad-bod men. The "free because you are the product they are selling" dating site OK Cupid used to have a blog that analyzed everything about its users, turns out men rate womens attractiveness on a bell curve, and women rate 80% of all men "less than average" attractiveness.

Women in general dont have the self reflection to understand they are all chasing these top 1%ers of men and if they want to keep him for a lifetime and not just one night they have to be a top woman themselves. But they are told since before they are teenagers that they are perfect and dont need to change or improve anything.

Also both men and women do this: they believe what they find attractive in the opposite sex, the opposite sex finds attractive in them. Women think men find a tall, aggressive, highly educated, world traveled/experienced, career driven woman attractive because it is what they find attractive in men. And men, however cliche it is, think women like men who are "nice".... surprisingly that trait is very low on womens list of desires, and ask any woman about her ex, she will without a doubt say he was "an abusive jerk".... you dated him sweetheart, what does that say about what you desire in a man?

Its a sad state of affairs modern dating has become

2
Citizen_of_Amalek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cleopatra was so Greek [the daughter of Ptolemy, also Greek] that it was considered historically noteworthy that she learned to speak Egyptian, as the majority of Greeks living in Egypt did not, and no one before her in the Greek ruling class of Egypt.

7
Citizen_of_Amalek 7 points ago +7 / -0

a "betabux" isnt so much what he has, but what he is. A $40k earning "beta" will still let some thot walk all over him and give her everything he owns, and control of [their] his finances.

10
Citizen_of_Amalek 10 points ago +10 / -0

nope, I dont care about big floppy tits. just "not obese" natural tits are perfect if they fit her frame, meaning: if a woman is a corn-fed "laborer" body type, a broad shouldered midwestern kind, she would look mannish if she didnt have tits to fill her out.

i would instead add "not ran through" or "not a bitch" / "nice" / "feminine"

but that is too much to ask I guess.

17
Citizen_of_Amalek 17 points ago +17 / -0

is there one for women? i want to know how fucked everything is.

height - doesnt matter

income - doesnt matter

education - preferably NOT college educated

age - 25-30

weight - not obese

2
Citizen_of_Amalek 2 points ago +2 / -0

yep. "Conservative Inc" accepts gays and i think troons who havent yet been caught diddling kids. and that transitioning kids should take place when they are 18. so pathetic

7
Citizen_of_Amalek 7 points ago +7 / -0

we know the governments are doing this to destabilize the country and fracture communities to make them more accepting of the NWO, but what is the public reason they state they are doing this? what do they push that the public is supposed to believe is the reason?

Because as I said, its not sustainable at all: no jobs, no housing, no infrastructure to support them.

20
Citizen_of_Amalek 20 points ago +20 / -0

yep, 500 residents is not a city.

and the migrants are being sent there to stay in a hotel. we all know why they are being sent there but what is the government reason? its not like there are 400 jobs for these people, or enough permanent residences, or any infrastructure or anything.

everyone should watch what is happening in the UK because while they have imported less illegal migrants, their population is lower so the percentage of migrants is much higher.