The problem is that you’re trying to balance on this tight-rope of what is and isn’t allowed by Google, who constantly switches the terms of service.

And the “no pornography or bad speech thing”? I don’t have that limitation on the other forums/news sites that I frequent, and I’m not confident that it won’t overextend to slightly risqué things. That restriction alone will limit what articles you put out and what your commenters can do.

I would like OAG to keep in line with its past and encourage the staff to do their best, but it’s hard for me to do that when this feels like another subversion in the making.

The problem is that you’re trying to balance on this tight-rope of what is and isn’t allowed by Google, who constantly switches the terms of service.

And the “no pornography or hate speech thing”? I don’t have that limitation on the other forums/news sites that I frequent, and I’m not confident that it won’t overextend to slightly risqué things. That restriction alone will limit what articles you put out and what your commenters can do.

I would like OAG to keep in line with its past and encourage the staff to do their best, but it’s hard for me to do that when this feels like another subversion in the making.

The problem is that you’re trying to balance on this tight-rope of what is and isn’t allowed by Google, who constantly switches the terms of service.

And the “no pornography or hate speech thing”? I don’t have that limitation on the other forums/news sites that I frequent, and I’m not confident that it won’t overextend to slightly risqué things. That restriction alone will limit what articles you put out and what your commenters can do.

I would like OAG to keep in line with its past and encourage the staff to do their best, but it’s hard for me to do that when this feels like another subversion in the making.

The problem is that you’re trying to balance on this tight-rope of what is and isn’t allowed by Google, who constantly switches the terms of service.

And the “no pornography thing”? I don’t have that limitation on the other forums/news sites that I frequent, and I’m not confident that it won’t overextend to slightly risqué things. That restriction alone will limit what articles you put out and what your commenters can do.

I would like OAG to keep in line with its past and encourage the staff to do their best, but it’s hard for me to do that when this feels like another subversion in the making.

The problem is that you’re trying to balance on this tight-rope of what is and isn’t allowed by Google, who constantly switches the terms of service.

And the “no pornography or hate speech” thing? I don’t have that limitation on a lot of other forums/news sites that I frequent, and I’m not confident that it won’t overextend to slightly risqué things. That restriction alone will limit what articles you put out and what your commenters can do.

I would like OAG to keep in line with its past and encourage the staff to do their best, but it’s hard for me to do that when this feels like another subversion in the making.