Revisions | Kotaku In Action 2 - The Official Gamergate Forum

Reason: None provided.

Oi, I get it now. You're not mentally all there.

I'm going to try to simplify this so you can understand.

You responded to this comment...

Only gay men SO FAR. As soon as a bisexual gets it, it'll be something straight people have to worry about.

With this...

"Straight people don't tend to have sexual relations with bisexuals. It can happen but it's pretty rare."

I explained to you that straight men, do in fact sleep with bisexual women. Here is a study explaining the prevalence of that preference in the U.K:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886918303842

Unlike you, I have not linked to any random opinion pieces on medium; I'm not talking about anecdotes, and I'm NOT saying "EVERY" woman, like you keep alluding to.

Your arguments don't make any sense to what we're discussing.

If you don't like the data because it disrupts your world view, then that's a you problem, not a data problem. And you attempting to argue that you cannot trust any statistics because they can be manipulated may as well apply to everything; you can't trust that niggers rob and rape and steal more because the numbers are manipulated, right?

Anyway, I outlined that frequency and prevalence of blokes hooking up with bisexual whores happens in areas where faggotry is prevalent, such as Melbourne, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, or London. Here is a statistical map so you can understand:

Let me make this very clear to you: No one is saying majority of straight women are bisexual. No one ever said that. No one typed that. You won't find it anywhere in this comment thread. Why you even came to that conclusion shows a clear disconnect with you not comprehending what the original poster typed and what I responded with.

Do you understand?

EDIT: Also, to address your misapplication of statistics here...

Even if you assume all the "non-binaries" are women, that means women identifying as bisexual are 0.83% of the US adult population and thus about 1.7% of the US women. A tiny number.

You're comparing that 1.7% against all women in the U.S., when that number is only applicable to women between the ages of 18 - 45, those are the ones regularly sleeping around and sexually active. That's why I quoted Aaron Clarey's stats about the 8 - 11% stat of women aged 18 - 35 being on OnlyFans. It's about the demographic percentages, not the flat generalities, and 11% is highly significant for women of marrying age.

Hence, why I linked to the demographic survey from PRRI showing 28% of Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ faggots, because it's a significant percentage of a narrow demographic of individuals, and that's the demographic that matters in relation to the discussion about prominently sexually active adults.

Anyway, all I posted was statistics about the sexual behaviours of bisexual women; how it coincides with what the other poster said: Yes, the disease CAN jump if some straight bloke bangs a bisexual chick who banged a bisexual bloke who banged a poofing faggot.

The numbers show that bisexual women are irrefutably, categorically, the highest STD/STI carriers per capita, next to gay and bisexual men.

It means, that u/Michalusmichalus/ point still stands: the disease can jump, if any straight lad sleeps with a bisexual woman in a highly concentrated area where bisexual women are likely to congregate and sleep around.

I don't know how much more simply I can make it.

No one is talking about some fair-skinned lass in the outback of Perth; no one is talking about some blonde-haired maiden living in the mountains of a small town in Montana; no one is talking about the sharp tongue wench in southern Wales. We're talking about the blokes who sleep with slags in areas where bisexual women are most prevalent.

Do you understand now? Are the words clear? No one is talking about majorities everywhere.

That was never a topic, it was never mentioned in any comment.

Do...
You...
Understand?

2 days ago

1 score

Reason: None provided.

Oi, I get it now. You're not mentally all there.

I'm going to try to simplify this so you can understand.

You responded to this comment...

Only gay men SO FAR. As soon as a bisexual gets it, it'll be something straight people have to worry about.

With this...

"Straight people don't tend to have sexual relations with bisexuals. It can happen but it's pretty rare."

I explained to you that straight men, do in fact sleep with bisexual women. Here is a study explaining the prevalence of that preference in the U.K:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886918303842

Unlike you, I have not linked to any random opinion pieces on medium; I'm not talking about anecdotes, and I'm NOT saying "EVERY" woman, like you keep alluding to.

Your arguments don't make any sense to what we're discussing.

If you don't like the data because it disrupts your world view, then that's a you problem, not a data problem. And you attempting to argue that you cannot trust any statistics because they can be manipulated may as well apply to everything; you can't trust that niggers rob and rape and steal more because the numbers are manipulated, right?

Anyway, I outlined that frequency and prevalence of blokes hooking up with bisexual whores happens in areas where faggotry is prevalent, such as Melbourne, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, or London. Here is a statistical map so you can understand:

Let me make this very clear to you: No one is saying majority of straight women are bisexual. No one ever said that. No one typed that. You won't find it anywhere in this comment thread. Why you even came to that conclusion shows a clear disconnect with you not comprehending what the original poster typed and what I responded with.

Do you understand?

EDIT: Also, to address your misapplication of statistics here...

Even if you assume all the "non-binaries" are women, that means women identifying as bisexual are 0.83% of the US adult population and thus about 1.7% of the US women. A tiny number.

You're comparing that 1.7% against all women in the U.S., when that number is only applicable to women between the ages of 18 - 45, those are the ones regularly sleeping around and sexually active. That's why I quoted Aaron Clarey's stats about the 8 - 11% stat of women aged 18 - 35 being on OnlyFans. It's about the demographic percentages, not the flat generalities, and 11% is highly significant for women of marrying age. Hence, why I linked to the demographic survey showing 28% of Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ faggots, because it's a significant percentage of a narrow demographic of individuals, and that's the demographic that matters in relation to the discussion about prominently sexually active adults.

Anyway, all I posted was statistics about the sexual behaviours of bisexual women; how it coincides with what the other poster said: Yes, the disease CAN jump if some straight bloke bangs a bisexual chick who banged a bisexual bloke who banged a poofing faggot.

The numbers show that bisexual women are irrefutably, categorically, the highest STD/STI carriers per capita, next to gay and bisexual men.

It means, that u/Michalusmichalus/ point still stands: the disease can jump, if any straight lad sleeps with a bisexual woman in a highly concentrated area where bisexual women are likely to congregate and sleep around.

I don't know how much more simply I can make it.

No one is talking about some fair-skinned lass in the outback of Perth; no one is talking about some blonde-haired maiden living in the mountains of a small town in Montana; no one is talking about the sharp tongue wench in southern Wales. We're talking about the blokes who sleep with slags in areas where bisexual women are most prevalent.

Do you understand now? Are the words clear? No one is talking about majorities everywhere.

That was never a topic, it was never mentioned in any comment.

Do...
You...
Understand?

2 days ago

1 score

Reason: None provided.

Oi, I get it now. You're not mentally all there.

I'm going to try to simplify this so you can understand.

You responded to this comment...

Only gay men SO FAR. As soon as a bisexual gets it, it'll be something straight people have to worry about.

With this...

"Straight people don't tend to have sexual relations with bisexuals. It can happen but it's pretty rare."

I explained to you that straight men, do in fact sleep with bisexual women. Here is a study explaining the prevalence of that preference in the U.K:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886918303842

Unlike you, I have not linked to any random opinion pieces on medium; I'm not talking about anecdotes, and I'm NOT saying "EVERY" woman, like you keep alluding to.

Your arguments don't make any sense to what we're discussing.

If you don't like the data because it disrupts your world view, then that's a you problem, not a data problem. And you attempting to argue that you cannot trust any statistics because they can be manipulated may as well apply to everything; you can't trust that niggers rob and rape and steal more because the numbers are manipulated, right?

Anyway, I outlined that frequency and prevalence of blokes hooking up with bisexual whores happens in areas where faggotry is prevalent, such as Melbourne, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, or London. Here is a statistical map so you can understand:

Let me make this very clear to you: No one is saying majority of straight women are bisexual. No one ever said that. No one typed that. You won't find it anywhere in this comment thread. Why you even came to that conclusion shows a clear disconnect with you not comprehending what the original poster typed and what I responded with.

Do you understand?

EDIT: Also, to address your misapplication of statistics here...

Even if you assume all the "non-binaries" are women, that means women identifying as bisexual are 0.83% of the US adult population and thus about 1.7% of the US women. A tiny number.

You're comparing that 1.7% against all women in the U.S., when that number is only applicable to women between the ages of 18 - 45, those are the ones regularly sleeping around and sexually active. That's why I quoted Aaron Clarey's stats about the 8 - 11% stat of women aged 18 - 35 being on OnlyFans. It's about the demographic percentages, not the flat generalities. Hence, why I linked to the demographic survey showing 28% of Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ faggots, because it's a significant percentage of a narrow demographic of individuals, and that's the demographic that matters in relation to the discussion about prominently sexually active adults.

Anyway, all I posted was statistics about the sexual behaviours of bisexual women; how it coincides with what the other poster said: Yes, the disease CAN jump if some straight bloke bangs a bisexual chick who banged a bisexual bloke who banged a poofing faggot.

The numbers show that bisexual women are irrefutably, categorically, the highest STD/STI carriers per capita, next to gay and bisexual men.

It means, that u/Michalusmichalus/ point still stands: the disease can jump, if any straight lad sleeps with a bisexual woman in a highly concentrated area where bisexual women are likely to congregate and sleep around.

I don't know how much more simply I can make it.

No one is talking about some fair-skinned lass in the outback of Perth; no one is talking about some blonde-haired maiden living in the mountains of a small town in Montana; no one is talking about the sharp tongue wench in southern Wales. We're talking about the blokes who sleep with slags in areas where bisexual women are most prevalent.

Do you understand now? Are the words clear? No one is talking about majorities everywhere.

That was never a topic, it was never mentioned in any comment.

Do...
You...
Understand?

2 days ago

1 score

Reason: None provided.

Oi, I get it now. You're not mentally all there.

I'm going to try to simplify this so you can understand.

You responded to this comment...

Only gay men SO FAR. As soon as a bisexual gets it, it'll be something straight people have to worry about.

With this...

"Straight people don't tend to have sexual relations with bisexuals. It can happen but it's pretty rare."

I explained to you that straight men, do in fact sleep with bisexual women. Here is a study explaining the prevalence of that preference in the U.K:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886918303842

Unlike you, I have not linked to any random opinion pieces on medium; I'm not talking about anecdotes, and I'm NOT saying "EVERY" woman, like you keep alluding to.

Your arguments don't make any sense to what we're discussing.

If you don't like the data because it disrupts your world view, then that's a you problem, not a data problem. And you attempting to argue that you cannot trust any statistics because they can be manipulated may as well apply to everything; you can't trust that niggers rob and rape and steal more because the numbers are manipulated, right?

Anyway, I outlined that frequency and prevalence of blokes hooking up with bisexual whores happens in areas where faggotry is prevalent, such as Melbourne, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, or London. Here is a statistical map so you can understand:

Let me make this very clear to you: No one is saying majority of straight women are bisexual. No one ever said that. No one typed that. You won't find it anywhere in this comment thread. Why you even came to that conclusion shows a clear disconnect with you not comprehending what the original poster typed and what I responded with.

Do you understand?

All I posted, was statistics about the sexual behaviours of bisexual women; how it coincides with what the other poster said: Yes, the disease CAN jump if some straight bloke bangs a bisexual chick who banged a bisexual bloke who banged a poofing faggot.

The numbers show that bisexual women are irrefutably, categorically, the highest STD/STI carriers per capita, next to gay and bisexual men.

It means, that u/Michalusmichalus/ point still stands: the disease can jump, if any straight lad sleeps with a bisexual woman in a highly concentrated area where bisexual women are likely to congregate and sleep around.

I don't know how much more simply I can make it.

No one is talking about some fair-skinned lass in the outback of Perth; no one is talking about some blonde-haired maiden living in the mountains of a small town in Montana; no one is talking about the sharp tongue wench in southern Wales. We're talking about the blokes who sleep with slags in areas where bisexual women are most prevalent.

Do you understand now? Are the words clear? No one is talking about majorities everywhere.

That was never a topic, it was never mentioned in any comment.

Do...
You...
Understand?

2 days ago

1 score

Reason: Original

Oi, I get it now. You're not mentally all there.

I'm going to try to simplify this so you can understand.

You responded to this comment...

Only gay men SO FAR. As soon as a bisexual gets it, it'll be something straight people have to worry about.

With this...

"Straight people don't tend to have sexual relations with bisexuals. It can happen but it's pretty rare."

I explained to you that straight men, do in fact sleep with bisexual women. Here is a study explaining the prevalence of that preference in the U.K:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886918303842

Unlike you, I have not linked to any random opinion pieces on medium; I'm not talking about anecdotes, and I'm NOT saying "EVERY" woman, like you keep alluding to.

Your arguments don't make any sense to what we're discussing.

If you don't like the data because it disrupts your world view, then that's a you problem, not a data problem.

I outlined that frequency and prevalence of blokes hooking up with bisexual whores happens in areas where faggotry is prevalent, such as Melbourne, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, or London. Here is a statistical map so you can understand:

Let me make this very clear to you: No one is saying majority of straight women are bisexual. No one ever said that. No one typed that. You won't find it anywhere in this comment thread. Why you even came to that conclusion shows a clear disconnect with you not comprehending what the original poster typed and what I responded with.

Do you understand?

All I posted, was statistics about the sexual behaviours of bisexual women; how it coincides with what the other poster said: Yes, the disease CAN jump if some straight bloke bangs a bisexual chick who banged a bisexual bloke who banged a poofing faggot.

The numbers show that bisexual women are irrefutably, categorically, the highest STD/STI carriers per capita, next to gay and bisexual men.

It means, that u/Michalusmichalus/ point still stands: the disease can jump, if any straight lad sleeps with a bisexual woman in a highly concentrated area where bisexual women are likely to congregate and sleep around.

I don't know how much more simply I can make it.

No one is talking about some fair-skinned lass in the outback of Perth; no one is talking about some blonde-haired maiden living in the mountains of a small town in Montana; no one is talking about the sharp tongue wench in southern Wales. We're talking about the blokes who sleep with slags in areas where bisexual women are most prevalent.

Do you understand now? Are the words clear? No one is talking about majorities everywhere.

That was never a topic, it was never mentioned in any comment.

Do...
You...
Understand?

2 days ago

1 score