Not at all. It's the logical thing to do. You destroy factories and weapons stop flowing to the front lines. You kill the leadership and they install someone new. Rebuilding manufacturing is painfully slow. Giving the next guy a promotion takes 5 minutes.
The US killed 40 some Iranian officials. Didn't stop shit. Assassinating a dozen supreme leaders has less impact on combat capability than destroying a single steel foundry unless the impending threat is enough to sway the next guy's actions.
public infrastructure
No one goes through the extra cost of building dedicated "military infrastructure" for the sole purpose of giving potential enemies cleaner targets. I'd be willing to bet that no matter what country you're in, your military facilities share at least some upstream energy, water, and transport infrastructure with civilian facilities.
Not at all. It's the logical thing to do. You destroy factories and weapons stop flowing to the front lines. You kill the leadership and they install someone new. Rebuilding manufacturing is painfully slow. Giving the next guy a promotion takes 5 minutes.
The US killed 40 some Iranian officials. Didn't stop shit. Assassinating a dozen supreme leader has less impact on combat capability than destroying a single steel foundry unless the impending threat is enough to sway the next guy's actions.
public infrastructure
No one goes through the extra cost of building dedicated "military infrastructure" for the sole purpose of giving potential enemies cleaner targets. I'd be willing to bet that no matter what country you're in, your military facilities share at least some upstream energy, water, and transport infrastructure with civilian facilities.
Not at all. It's the logical thing to do. You destroy factories and weapons stop flowing to the front lines. You kill the leadership and they install someone new. Rebuilding manufacturing is painfully slow. Giving the next guy a promotion takes 5 minutes.
The US killed 40 some Iranian officials. Didn't stop shit. Assassinating a dozen supreme leader has less impact on combat capability than destroying a single steel foundry unless the impending threat is enough to sway the next guy's actions.
public infrastructure
No one goes through the extra cost of building dedicated "military infrastructure" for the sole purpose of giving your enemies cleaner targets. I'd be willing to bet that no matter what country you're in, your military facilities share at least some upstream energy, water, and transport infrastructure with civilian facilities.
Not at all. It's the logical thing to do. You destroy factories and weapons stop flowing to the front lines. You kill the leadership and they install someone new. Rebuilding manufacturing is painfully slow. Giving the next guy a promotion takes 5 minutes.
The US killed 40 some Iranian officials. Didn't stop shit. Assassinating a dozen supreme leader has less impact on combat capability than destroying a single steel foundry unless the impending threat is enough to sway the next guy's actions.
public infrastructure
No one goes through the extra cost of building dedicated "military infrastructure" for the sole purpose of giving your enemies cleaner targets. I'd be willing to bet that no matter what country you're in, your military facilities share at least some upstream energy , water, and transport infrastructure with civilian facilities.
Not at all. It's the logical thing to do. You destroy factories and weapons stop flowing to the front lines. You kill the leadership and they install someone new. Rebuilding manufacturing is painfully slow. Giving the next guy a promotion takes 5 minutes.
The US killed 40 some Iranian officials. Didn't stop shit. Assassinating a dozen supreme leader has less impact on combat capability than destroying a single steel foundry unless the impending threat is enough to sway the next guy's actions.
public infrastructure
No one builds dedicated "military infrastructure" for the purpose of giving your enemies cleaner targets. I'd be willing to bet that no matter what country you're in, your military facilities share at least some upstream energy , water, and transport infrastructure with civilian facilities.
Not at all. It's the logical thing to do. You destroy factories and weapons stop flowing to the front lines. You kill the leadership and they install someone new. Rebuilding manufacturing is painfully slow. Giving the next guy a promotion takes 5 minutes.
The US killed 40 some Iranian officials. Didn't stop shit. Assassinating a dozen supreme leader has less impact on combat capability than destroying a single steel foundry unless the impending threat is enough to sway the next guy's actions.
public infrastructure
No one builds dedicated "military infrastructure" for the purpose of giving your enemies cleaner targets. I'd be willing to bet that no matter what country you're in, your military facilities share at least some upstream energy , water, and transport infrastructure with civilian facilities.
Not at all. It's the logical thing to do. You destroy factories and weapons stop flowing to the front lines. You kill the leadership and they install someone new. Rebuilding manufacturing is painfully slow. Giving the next guy a promotion takes 5 minutes.
The US killed 40 some Iranian officials. Didn't stop shit. Assassinating a dozen supreme leader has less impact on combat capability than destroying a single steel foundry unless the impending threat is enough to sway the next guy's actions.