Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

you giant un-American idiot

ad hominem

FCC can't decide what is and isn't in the public interest.

This has nothing to do with the original article. the actions would not be based on "public interest", they would be based on libel. whether or not the publications are knowingly promoting a hoax, not whether what they're reporting is in the public interest. The fcc had a whole section on hoaxes specifically when related to a crime or catastrophy (such as a foreign attack on our base): https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/guides/hoaxes

High school brain in action. How do media lies "undermine" the war? If I lie about planes here in the US a soldier dies in Iran? Explain your apparent stupidity to us.

I agree, the position is dodgy at best. Take it up with Trump, he's the one making the argument. all I'm doing is pointing out that his position on this issue has nothing to do with anti-semitism contrary to what the op claims. the article he cites about the destroyed planes doesn't even mention Israel, jews, or semites.

The FCC cannot threaten this, cannot act on this, cannot unilaterally make decisions about anything

the FCC has the power to issue fines, and in so-called "extreme cases", the FCC has the power to revoke licenses.

It can't even initiate a fucking court case against a broadcaster over standards.

I believe this is true, however.

After Epstein. This is your line? You bought off son of a bitch.

ad hominem and whataboutism.

84 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

you giant un-American idiot

ad hominem

FCC can't decide what is and isn't in the public interest.

This has nothing to do with the original article. the actions would not be based on "public interest", they would be based on libel. whether or not the publications are knowingly promoting a hoax, not whether what they're reporting is in the public interest. The fcc had a whole section on hoaxes specifically when related to a crime or catastrophy (such as a foreign attack on our base): https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/guides/hoaxes

High school brain in action. How do media lies "undermine" the war? If I lie about planes here in the US a soldier dies in Iran? Explain your apparent stupidity to us.

I agree, the position is dodgy at best. Take it up with Trump, he's the one making the argument. all I'm doing is pointing out that his position on this issue has nothing to do with anti-semitism contrary to what the op claims. the article he cites about the destroyed planes doesn't even mention Israel, jews, or semites.

After Epstein. This is your line? You bought off son of a bitch.

ad hominem and whataboutism.

84 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

you giant un-American idiot

ad hominem

FCC can't decide what is and isn't in the public interest.

This has nothing to do with the original article. the actions would not be based on "public interest", they would be based on libel. whether or not the publications are knowingly promoting a hoax, not whether what they're reporting is in the public interest. The fcc had a whole section on hoaxes specifically when related to a crime or catastrophy (such as a foreign attack on our base): https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/guides/hoaxes

High school brain in action. How do media lies "undermine" the war? If I lie about planes here in the US a soldier dies in Iran? Explain your apparent stupidity to us.

I agree, the position is dodgy at best. Take it up with Trump, he's the one making the argument. all I'm doing is pointing out that his position on this issue has nothing to do with anti-semitism contrary to what the op claims.

After Epstein. This is your line? You bought off son of a bitch.

ad hominem and whataboutism.

84 days ago
1 score