https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/2032163961752145981
The whole piece is structured around the anecdotal experience of a woman who adopted right wing talking points for “aesthetic” reasons then quickly turned away when her feelings were hurt. Now she’s gossiping about her former friends behind the cover of anonymity. If the goal of the article is to actually prove the “misogynists” right then I have to say it’s profoundly effective.
The piece also cites Hannah Cox who was never conservative, much less a serous or intelligent person. And Ashley St Clair who recently came out as pro-trans just to spite Elon Musk. The whole premise is that conservative women are turning away from MAGA and yet they don’t mention a single conservative woman in the entire article. Amazing.
https://x.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/2032167777658687998
There are some people who identify as "right wing" who are definitely nasty to women and embrace a third-world mentality that would be better suited to Afghanistan, but they are mostly just trolls, not mainstream MAGA figures let alone elected officials. And to be honest, the left's trolls are just as nasty to women whose politics they disagree with. This article seems like it was written with a foregone conclusion in mind, and the journalist only called a few women who would provide quotes to fit that pre-defined narrative.
https://x.com/InezFeltscher/status/2032136674717679818
Once again the critics of “rw misogyny” end up proving the thesis that a surprising percentage of women cannot discuss ideas or policy without taking it personally and policing the tone of the conversation.
https://x.com/herandrews/status/2032061768759918710
Mostly this piece is boring and predictable but I will say that “Don’t publicly trash your old side unless you’re willing to put your name next to it” is one of those honor-based rules of open conflict that feminized societies just don’t get, so thanks for illustrating the point.
Evie mag founder Brittany Hugoboom claims to know who "Anna" is but won't reveal her identity.
https://x.com/BritHugoboom/status/2032168184875188513
It’s Hannah Cox and the Substack “based” feminists who constantly attack any woman who comments positively on men. “Anna” flipped on me years ago out of nowhere.
Me FYI https://x.com/BigOrmie/status/2032174270034661732
If you know who she is call her out by her real name. She wants to go public then let's make her public.
https://x.com/BritHugoboom/status/2032174483729957265
Well she said in the article she doesn’t want to go public so honoring that
https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/2032163961752145981
The whole piece is structured around the anecdotal experience of a woman who adopted right wing talking points for “aesthetic” reasons then quickly turned away when her feelings were hurt. Now she’s gossiping about her former friends behind the cover of anonymity. If the goal of the article is to actually prove the “misogynists” right then I have to say it’s profoundly effective.
The piece also cites Hannah Cox who was never conservative, much less a serous or intelligent person. And Ashley St Clair who recently came out as pro-trans just to spite Elon Musk. The whole premise is that conservative women are turning away from MAGA and yet they don’t mention a single conservative woman in the entire article. Amazing.
https://x.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/2032167777658687998
There are some people who identify as "right wing" who are definitely nasty to women and embrace a third-world mentality that would be better suited to Afghanistan, but they are mostly just trolls, not mainstream MAGA figures let alone elected officials. And to be honest, the left's trolls are just as nasty to women whose politics they disagree with. This article seems like it was written with a foregone conclusion in mind, and the journalist only called a few women who would provide quotes to fit that pre-defined narrative.
https://x.com/InezFeltscher/status/2032136674717679818
Once again the critics of “rw misogyny” end up proving the thesis that a surprising percentage of women cannot discuss ideas or policy without taking it personally and policing the tone of the conversation.
https://x.com/herandrews/status/2032061768759918710
Mostly this piece is boring and predictable but I will say that “Don’t publicly trash your old side unless you’re willing to put your name next to it” is one of those honor-based rules of open conflict that feminized societies just don’t get, so thanks for illustrating the point.