It's worth pointing out as well that this issue is specific to BC as all other provinces have land treaties in place while large parts of BC were never actually ceded to the government, hence the court victories.

One wonders, however, what jurisdiction the court has if it's not based on Canadian land.

Edit: Here's the result of a five minute search.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_First_Nations_treaties_in_British_Columbia

The only land in BC that actually belongs to the government of Canada is Vancouver Island and a chunk in the far north east that's part of treaty 8. It was the BC government themselves that decided to not pursue treaties, which are explicitely required to obtain Canadian land under federal law, until the 1990s.

So no, contrary to the article, this ruling changes nothing for the rest of Canada; BC is just at the "find out" part of electing actual retards for over a hundred years.

It's worth pointing out as well that this issue is specific to BC as all other provinces have land treaties in place while large parts of BC were never actually ceded to the government, hence the court victories.

One wonders, however, what jurisdiction the court has if it's not based on Canadian land.