Actually, probably yes. Because of the way the data is based on total balances, the total number of students is totally irrelevant. It's about how much of the total of that specific race is quota backed female entries.

Considering quotas kicked into action in the middle of the measured data, it's likely that the majority of the black cohort was female (double quota), and this likely started being overwhelmingly true around 2015 when the graph abruptly spiked. This would explain why every line on the graph has a deviation upwards around that time. That's when female quotas started to become extremely aggressive, and men withdrew from higher education due to female hostility and malice, creating a self-selecting group of those who wanted to go to college enough that they were willing to risk that.

Actually, probably yes. Because of the way the data is based on total balances, the total number of students is totally irrelevant. It's about how much of the total of that specific race is quota backed female entries.

Considering quotas kicked into action in the middle of the measured data, it's likely that the majority of the black cohort was female (double quota), and this likely started being overwhelmingly true around 2015 when the graph abruptly spiked. This would explain why every line on the graph has a deviation upwards around that time. That's when female quotas started to become extremely aggressive, and men withdrew from higher education due to female hostility and malice, creating a self-selecting group of those who truly wanted to study.

Actually, probably yes. Because of the way the data is based on total balances, the total number of students is totally irrelevant. It's about how much of the total of that specific race is quota backed female entries.

Considering quotas kicked into action in the middle of the measured data, it's likely that the majority of the black cohort was female (double quota), and this likely started being overwhelmingly true around 2015 when the graph abruptly spiked. This would explain why every line on the graph has a deviation upwards around that time. That's when female quotas started to become extremely aggressive.

Actually, probably yes. Because of the way the data is based on total balances, the total number of students is totally irrelevant. It's about how much of the total of that specific race is quota backed female entries.

Considering quotas kicked into action in the middle of the measured data, it's likely that the majority of the black cohort was female (double quota), and this likely started being overwhelmingly true around 2015 when the graph abruptly spiked. This