Did you know Vatican 2 would not have passed had Vatican 1 not been first passed? Vatican 1 is as bad as 2. They're both trash.

Also, if you think Vatican 2 is wrong since it only passed because the Pope was considered infallible for religious matters, then you're actually tacking a crack at Vatican 1 too. That's because for Vatican 2 to be bad, you'd have to believe the Pope made a mistake in allowing 2 thus the Pope isn't infallible and therefore Vatican 1 is logically proven wrong if 2 is wrong. You can't hate 2 without also hating 1.

Did you know Vatican 2 would not have passed had Vatican 1 not been first passed? Vatican 1 is as bad as 2. They're both trash.

Also, if you think Vatican 2 is wrong since it only passed because the Pope was considered infallible for religious matters, then you're actually tacking a crack at Vatican 1 too. That's because for Vatican 2 to be bad, you'd have to believe the Pope made a mistake in allowing 2 this the Pope isn't infallible and therefore Vatican 1 is logically proven wrong if 2 is wrong. You can't hate 2 without also hating 1.

Did you know Vatican 2 would not have passed had Vatican 1 not been first passed? Vatican 1 is as bad as 2. They're both trash.

Also, if you think Vatican 2 is wrong and it only passed because the Pope was considered infallible for religious matters, then you're actually tacking a crack at Vatican 1 too. That's because for Vatican 2 to be bad, you'd have to believe the Pope made a mistake in allowing 2 this the Pope isn't infallible and therefore Vatican 1 is logically proven wrong if 2 is wrong. You can't hate 2 without also hating 1.

Did you know Vatican 2 would not have passed had Vatican 1 not been first passed? Vatican 1 is as bad as 2. They're both trash.

Did you know Vatican 2 would not have passed had Vatican 1 not been first passed? Vatican 2 is as bad as 2. They're both trash.