Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Doesn't need to be planted, vested interests can piggyback existing personalities in the same way the Israel lobby thought they could piggyback on Kirk while he was alive. Above all, I can think of no good reason why anyone's response to the Kirk killing would be to start a 'prove me wrong!' type tour, which is what these guys' new Fearless Debates thing is. Either they're retards trying to get themselves (or their copycats) shot, or they're nudgers trying to generate a load of 2020-style BLM-bait in an attempt convince Americans that they're back in 2020 and not 2025, post-Kirk.

Funnily enough I just realised their tour name Fearless Debates has a lot of relevance to a recent bugbear of mine, which is this: 'Fearless' is a worthless word which undermines the value of 'courage'. Simple minds are fearless, the train nigger was fearless as he stomped around boasting to the air and expecting a reward for murdering a white girl. Conservatives absolutely should fear going out and mimicking Charlie Kirk right now, it's retardation or else just evil to suggest otherwise. But those with courage can continue to act in the service of their values, in spite of their legitimate fears.

It's just that going out and getting yourself shot like Kirk, or persuading others to do similar by example, is a terrible stupid value. Might be fearlessness, but who cares. If it's courage, it's courage in the service of conservacuckery incarnate.

Edit: featured on Fox News, of all things

https://x.com/David_Khait/status/1973772876059910437

Just keep talking to eachother, goy! Lower the temperature...! aheheh

Edit: 2: bro are you fucking kidding me with that necklace for your big 'Fox News debut'

248 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Doesn't need to be planted, vested interests can piggyback existing personalities in the same way the Israel lobby thought they could piggyback on Kirk while he was alive. Above all, I can think of no good reason why anyone's response to the Kirk killing would be to start a 'prove me wrong!' type tour, which is what these guys' new Fearless Debates thing is. Either they're retards trying to get themselves (or their copycats) shot, or they're nudgers trying to generate a load of 2020-style BLM-bait in an attempt convince Americans that they're back in 2020 and not 2025, post-Kirk.

Funnily enough I just realised their tour name Fearless Debates has a lot of relevance to a recent bugbear of mine, which is this: 'Fearless' is a worthless word which undermines the value of 'courage'. Simple minds are fearless, the train nigger was fearless as he stomped around boasting to the air and expecting a reward for murdering a white girl. Conservatives absolutely should fear going out and mimicking Charlie Kirk right now, it's retardation or else just evil to suggest otherwise. But those with courage can continue to act in the service of their values, in spite of their legitimate fears.

It's just that going out and getting yourself shot like Kirk, or persuading others to do similar by example, is a terrible stupid value. Might be fearlessness, but who cares. If it's courage, it's courage in the service of conservacuckery incarnate.

Edit: featured on Fox News, of all things

https://x.com/David_Khait/status/1973772876059910437

Just keep talking to eachother, goy! Lower the temperature...! aheheh

248 days ago
2 score
Reason: Original

Doesn't need to be planted, vested interests can piggyback existing personalities in the same way the Israel lobby thought they could piggyback on Kirk while he was alive. Above all, I can think of no good reason why anyone's response to the Kirk killing would be to start a 'prove me wrong!' type tour, which is what these guys' new Fearless Debates thing is. Either they're retards trying to get themselves (or their copycats) shot, or they're nudgers trying to generate a load of 2020-style BLM-bait in an attempt convince Americans that they're back in 2020 and not 2025, post-Kirk.

Funnily enough I just realised their tour name Fearless Debates has a lot of relevance to a recent bugbear of mine, which is this: 'Fearless' is a worthless word which undermines the value of 'courage'. Simple minds are fearless, the train nigger was fearless as he stomped around boasting to the air and expecting a reward for murdering a white girl. Conservatives absolutely should fear going out and mimicking Charlie Kirk right now, it's retardation or else just evil to suggest otherwise. But those with courage can continue to act in the service of their values, in spite of their legitimate fears.

It's just that going out and getting yourself shot like Kirk, or persuading others to do similar by example, is a terrible stupid value. Might be fearlessness, but who cares. If it's courage, it's courage in the service of conservacuckery incarnate.

248 days ago
1 score