1 - that is not what official sources are stating. In this account "the bullet should have gone through and hit people behind him."

2 - Paramount Tactical, who is the most credible proponent of the body armor theory, said himself he believes there is a "90% chance that Charlie was not wearing body armor."

1 - that is not what official sources are stating. In this account "the bullet should have gone through and hit people behind him."

2 - Paramount Tactical, who is the most credible proponent of the body armor theory, said himself he believes there is a "90% chance that Charlie was not wearing body armor."

edit: point 3 - if his neck wound is an exit wound, then how did the bullet reenter his body to lodge just beneath his skin?

1 - that is not what official sources are stating. In this account "the bullet should have gone through and hit people behind him."

2 - Paramount Tactical, who is the most credible proponent of the body armor theory, said himself he believes there is a "90% chance that Charlie was not wearing body armor."

edit: point 3 - if his neck wound is an exit wound, then how did the bullet reenter his body?

1 - that is not what official sources are stating. In this account "the bullet should have gone through and hit people behind him."

2 - Paramount Tactical, who is the most credible proponent of the body armor theory, said himself he believes there is a "90% chance that Charlie was not wearing body armor."