This is the inescapable corollary that follows “language as nothing more than passwords”. People who make discourse impossible are leaving you with only two options: your annihilation, or theirs.

A lot of cultures - many of them non-white - hold language to be purely transactional. For these people, communication is not a collaboration between two people seeking cooperation, mutual understanding, or truth. Instead, much of the non-white world see discourse as nothing more than a series of passwords that generate desired outcomes. There’s no legitimate argument or even meaning (definition) behind the words, nothing beyond “I say x, then I get y”.

You see it at the border: I said “refugee”, so now I get in, I get free stuff, etc. In truth, you’re just an illegal opportunistic economic migrant, but you’ve some demon working for an NGO gave you the password.

You see it in police interactions: I said “I can’t breathe”, so now they can’t detain me, can’t restrain me, etc. Now the police are victimizing you, brutalizing you, and you deserve freedom (from a complicit leftist activist in a black robe) and a payout (from complicit leftist activists posing as city councilors).

This dynamic dovetails nicely with the inherent subversions of Marxism, an ideology which fundamentally and deliberately undermines all discourse with blatant redefinitions and power games. That’s why so many non-white minority groups find allies among the left; they are both using language purely as a tool to extract resources and compliance from their (mostly white) victims.

This is the inescapable corollary that follows “language as nothing more than passwords”. People who make discourse impossible are leaving you with only two options: your annihilation, or theirs.

A lot of cultures - many of them non-white - hold language to be purely transactional. For these people, communication is not a collaboration between two people seeking cooperation, mutual understanding, or truth. Instead, much of the non-white world see discourse as nothing more than a series of passwords that generate desired outcomes. There’s no legitimate argument or even meaning (definition) behind the words, nothing beyond “I say x, then I get y”.

You see it at the border: I said “refugee”, so now I get in, I get free stuff, etc.

You see it in police interactions: I said “I can’t breathe”, so now they can’t detain me, can’t restrain me, etc.

This dynamic dovetails nicely with the inherent subversions of Marxism, an ideology which fundamentally and deliberately undermines all discourse with blatant redefinitions and power games. That’s why so many non-white minority groups find allies among the left; they are both using language purely as a tool to extract resources and compliance from their victims.