That's bullshit. That's not how international diplomacy works. One doesn't "assume" anything, it is spelled out or it doesn't count. It would only take a sentence, yet 26 pages & not once is it presented.

I know you imagine this is a great point and all, but it's not. Aside from the international law that was quoted, there is general agreement about what a Palestinian state would look like.

Gaza was not occupied, it was 100% ruled by Hamas

No, it's not. A sovereign state has control of its borders. Gaza did not. It did not have control of its airspace. It does not control its waters. Its population had to be registered in Israel.

Israel had nothing to do with it except that Gaza was launching terror attacks non-stop

More like, constantly bombing Gaza, which did actual damage as opposed to the pinpricks that Hamas launched in retaliation.

That's because there hadn't been an election at the time it was handed over. DUH!

You said Israel gave "Hamas" a state. DUH! Now you realize how stupid you were, and you're trying to save face by admitting what I told you when you didn't realize it.

And Hamas won, Fatah fled to the West Bank and declared themselves the election winner & took power there. DUH!

Yeah, thank you for your Wikipedia-tier knowledge.

Seriously? I'm a Nazi (says you) but the Jews & others who survived Nazi extermination SHOULD BE KILLED?

Now, in Great Russia they use the proverb "honest as a German". Do they say "dishonest as a kholkhol" as well? Why did you leave out the first part?

"People who abduct babies and Holocaust survivors deserve extermination." vs. "Holocaust survivors deserve extermination."

Who are you trying to fool? Either you're too stupid to realize that this is talking about Hamas, or you're the single most dishonest person I've ever encountered. Which is worse, I leave it up to you.

That's bullshit. That's not how international diplomacy works. One doesn't "assume" anything, it is spelled out or it doesn't count. It would only take a sentence, yet 26 pages & not once is it presented.

I know you imagine this is a great point and all, but it's not. Aside from the international law that was quoted, there is general agreement about what a Palestinian state would look like.

Gaza was not occupied, it was 100% ruled by Hamas

No, it's not. A sovereign state has control of its borders. Gaza did not. It did not have control of its airspace. It does not control its waters. Its population had to be registered in Israel.

Israel had nothing to do with it except that Gaza was launching terror attacks non-stop

More like, constantly bombing Gaza, which did actual damage as opposed to the pinpricks that Hamas launched in retaliation.

That's because there hadn't been an election at the time it was handed over. DUH!

You said Israel gave "Hamas" a state. DUH! Now you realize how stupid you were, and you're trying to save face by admitting what I told you when you didn't realize it.

And Hamas won, Fatah fled to the West Bank and declared themselves the election winner & took power there. DUH!

Yeah, thank you for your Wikipedia-tier knowledge.

Seriously? I'm a Nazi (says you) but the Jews & others who survived Nazi extermination SHOULD BE KILLED?

Now, in Great Russia they use the proverb "honest as a German". Do they say "dishonest as a kholkhol" as well? Why did you leave out the first part?

"People who abduct babies and Holocaust survivors deserve extermination." vs. "Holocaust survivors deserve extermination."

Who are you trying to fool?