LOL

Which are a traditionally impotent class.

Uh huh. Sure. Yeah. Okay. Billionaires = impotent! I guess, relative to trillionaire bankers, sure, billionaires are "impotent" by comparison. I guess all that lobbying of Congress and politicians by multi millionaires and billionaires just doesn't happen, and they're completely powerless in society.

Bondi's from Florida. She's a compromise with Ron and his people. I thought this was obvious.

Are you so into the Trump derangement syndrome (the other side of it) that you're afraid of admitting to yourself that you were wrong, and will conjure all manner of excuse to cover for that mistake? You have free will. You're not a machine. If you make a mistake, you can admit it, move on, and stop making that mistake.

How many bad picks does Trump have to make for you to get it? How many bad AGs has Trump appointed? All of them. How many pro Israel/jew picks has Trump made? All of them. It's a repeated pattern of behavior.

Let me spell it out for you really simply. Trump is a billionaire real estate mogul. That would mean he'd get all manner of leeches and fake friends, who only get close to him so they can get a share of his wealth, or get sweet heart deals for easy money. If Trump was a genuinely good person, he would've learned to spot the warning signs of such leeches and disingenuous people really quickly. Even normal guys learn really quickly to protect themselves when their "friends" backstab them. Trump, a billionaire, would (should) have his guard up a lot more to protect himself from these people, and would be able to spot them even moreso than the average guy. So, why then does Trump repeatedly pick people who constantly undermine and sabotage his campaign promises? That's not indicative of genuine behavior, or even incompetence. If the pattern of behavior always points toward one outcome, especially with regard to specific beliefs, then it's intentional.

Which list? The sex trafficking list or the money laundering list?

I guess it's easier to obfuscate an extremely clear issue than admit to being wrong.

The details you've ignored are far more important than the ones you've admitted. It seems like you want it to be an either or issue. Why?

So...when it comes to abducting, trafficking, raping, torturing, and murdering kids, helping to cover it up, and not punishing anyone responsible, you're arguing there's a grey area? Please, enlighten us to this "grey" area on that subject.

LOL

Which are a traditionally impotent class.

Uhhhhh. Sure. Billionaires = impotent! I guess, relative to trillionaire bankers, sure, billionaires are "impotent" by comparison. I guess all that lobbying of Congress and politicians by multi millionaires and billionaires just doesn't happen.

Bondi's from Florida. She's a compromise with Ron and his people. I thought this was obvious.

Are you so into the Trump defense that you're afraid of admitting to yourself that you were wrong, and will conjure all manner of excuse to cover for that mistake? You have free will. You're not a machine. If you make a mistake, you can admit it, move on, and stop making that mistake.

How many bad picks does Trump have to make for you to get it? How many bad AGs has Trump appointed? All of them. How many pro Israel/jew picks has Trump made? All of them. It's a repeated pattern of behavior.

Let me spell it out for you really simply. Trump is a billionaire real estate mogul. That would mean he'd get all manner of leeches and fake friends, who only get close to him so they can get a share of his wealth, or get sweet heart deals for easy money. If Trump was a genuinely good person, he would've learned to spot the warning signs of such leeches and disingenuous people really quickly. Even normal guys learn really quickly to protect themselves when their "friends" backstab them. Trump, a billionaire, would (should) have his guard up a lot more to protect himself from these people. So, why then does Trump repeatedly pick people who constantly undermine and sabotage his campaign promises? That's not indicative of genuine behavior, or even incompetence. If the pattern of behavior always points toward one outcome, especially with regard to specific beliefs, then it's intentional.

Which list? The sex trafficking list or the money laundering list?

I guess it's easier to obfuscate an extremely clear issue than admit being wrong.

The details you've ignored are far more important than the ones you've admitted. It seems like you want it to be an either or issue. Why?

So...when it comes to abducting, trafficking, raping, torturing, and murdering kids, helping to cover it up, and not punishing anyone responsible, you're arguing there's a grey area?