This is ridiculously hyperbolic.

The supreme court already has long allowed the law to ban "free speech" in advertising pornography to children or in ID checks for children consuming porn in real life. As much as some people want, the law is allowed to ban you from setting up a kiosk outside of an elementary school and selling children DVDs of hardcore penetration without checking IDs.

This ruling is upholding that the internet is also part of the real world and under the same rules. The imposition of ID checks to all people is justified as part of the imposition of ID checks to prevent distribution to children, and this is held in both the real world and online. Pornographers do not have an absolute right to show unlimited amounts of porn to 12 year olds, neither in real life nor in the internet.

This is ridiculously hyperbolic.

The supreme court already has long allowed the law to ban "free speech" in advertising pornography to children or in ID checks for children consuming porn in real life. As much as some people want, the law is allowed to ban you from setting up a kiosk outside of an elementary school and selling children DVDs of hardcore penetration without checking IDs. And that the imposition of ID checks to all people is justified as part of the imposition of ID checks to prevent distribution to children.

This ruling is upholding that the internet is also part of the real world and under the same rules. Pornographers do not have an absolute right to show unlimited amounts of porn to 12 year olds, neither in real life nor in the internet. Just like in real life, on the internet they hold that the imposition of ID checks to all people is justified as part of the imposition of ID checks to prevent distribution to children.

This is ridiculously hyperbolic.

The supreme court already has long allowed the law to ban "free speech" in advertising pornography to children or in ID checks for children consuming porn in real life. As much as some people want, the law is allowed to ban you from setting up a kiosk outside of an elementary school and selling children DVDs of hardcore penetration.

This ruling is upholding that the internet is also part of the real world and under the same rules. Pornographers do not have an absolute right to show unlimited amounts of porn to 12 year olds, neither in real life nor in the internet.