I mean.... sure but Tucker always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it. He even said that he once tried to speak against what israel was doing to Gaza and even pointed out that israel was bombing churches. but he immediately shut up about it when he got backlash for speaking against what israel was doing to Gaza. He wouldn't stand up against the zionist war mongerers when things got tough then so why would it be different now? Sure this might be different because its about America directly this time but the point is he tends to fold easily when against war mongerers.

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... sure but Tucker always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it. He even said that he once tried to speak against what israel was doing to Gaza and even pointed out that israel was bombing churches. but he immediately shut up about it when he got backlash for speaking against what israel was doing to Gaza. He wouldn't stand up against the zionist war mongerers when things got tough then so why would it be different now?

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... sure but Tucker always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it. I mean he once tried to speak against what israel was doing to Gaza and even pointed out that israel was bombing churches. but he immediately shut up about it when he got backlash for speaking against what israel was doing to Gaza. He wouldn't stand up against the zionist war mongerers when things got tough then so why would it be different now?

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... sure but Tucker always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it. I mean he once tried to speak against what israel was doing to Gaza and even pointed out that israel was bombing churches. but he immediately shut up about it when he got backlash for speaking against what israel was doing to Gaza. He wouldn't stand up against the war mongerers when things got tough then so why would it be different now?

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... sure but Tucker always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it. I mean he once tried to speak against what israel was doing to Gaza and even pointed out that israel was bombing churches. but he immediately shut up about it when he got backlash for speaking against what israel was doing to Gaza. He wouldn't stand up against the war mongerers then so why would it be different now?

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... sure but Tucker always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it. I mean he once tried to speak against what israel was doing to Gaza and even pointed out that israel was bombing churches. but he immediately shut up about it when he got backlash for speaking against what israel was doing to Gaza. Why would it be different now?

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... sure but he always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it. I mean he once tried to speak against what israel was doing to Gaza and even pointed out that israel was bombing churches. but he immediately shut up about it when he got backlash for speaking against what israel was doing to Gaza. Why would it be different now?

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... sure but he always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it. I mean he once tried to speak against what israel was doing to Gaza and even pointed out that israel was bombing churches. but he immediately shut up about it when he got backlash .

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... sure but he always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it. I mean he once tried to speak against what israel was doing to Gaza and even pointed out that israel was bombing churches. but he immediately shut up about it when he got backlash from his audience.

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... sure but he always seems tepid about speaking against war, and not aggressive about his anti war stances and certainly wont say anything against Trump for it.

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.

I mean.... is he aggressive about his anti war stance? has he spoken against Trump over it. ? I know that there are other right wing voices out there that speak against war, but they seem tepid about it and they don't seem out spoken and aggressive about their anti war stances.

The point was that Nick is the only one "unequivocally" against the wars, (as in he is the only one who is very aggressively against the wars) not that he is the only one against the war.