The JK Rowling conversation is a very efficient way of immediately flushing out the cucks on the right though. Those supposedly independent-minded men who, as soon as Rowling and TERFs are mentioned, will immediately demonstrate their pathological determination to blindly simp for any nominally feminist woman who expresses even a single opinion that vaguely coheres with their own viewpoint, with utter disregard for both her hypocrisy and the mendacity of her motivations.
As Ahaus has already pointed out in this thread, Rowling and the other TERFs not only refuse to acknowledge the role that they and their feminist crusade played in spawining trans ideology in the first place, but she also jealously defends her own right to express unpopular views at the same time as she demands people she disagrees with be denied their own right to do the same.
And yet legions of self-professed anti-woke men will immediately and gleefully demonstrate their unwillingness to move beyond the liberal Boomer mindset with waffling equivocations such as "You can take her side on one issue while still disagreeing with her on others," as if they genuinely expect this maniacal cunt to behave like a fucking adult and reciprocate that sentiment in their direction.
No. Context matters. Motivations matter.
The JK Rowling conversation is a very efficient way of immediately flushing out the cucks on the right though. Those supposedly independent-minded men who, as soon as Rowling and TERFs are mentioned, will immediately demonstrate their pathological determination to blindly simp for any nominally feminist woman who expresses even a single opinion that even vaguely coheres with their own viewpoint, with utter disregard for both her hypocrisy and the mendacity of her motivations.
As Ahaus has already pointed out in this thread, Rowling and the other TERFs not only refuse to acknowledge the role that they and their feminist crusade played in spawining trans ideology in the first place, but she also jealously defends her own right to express unpopular views at the same time as she demands people she disagrees with be denied their own right to do the same.
And yet legions of self-professed anti-woke men will immediately and gleefully demonstrate their unwillingness to move beyond the liberal Boomer mindset with waffling equivocations such as "You can take her side on one issue while still disagreeing with her on others," as if they genuinely expect this maniacal cunt to behave like a fucking adult and reciprocate that sentiment in their direction.
No. Context matters. Motivations matter.