his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"

walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole. they are pretty much controlled opposition. otherwise please tell me how they are so based by only daring to voice this opinion in june of 2025 (ignoring the fact they all spammed identical-phrased slogan on the same day).

nick predicts that, come the next election year, they will simultaneously withdraw from and renounce these "extreme" views altogether in favour of a much more lenient and progressive take on immigration, only to take up the digital pitchfork once again and resume the rabble-rousing from the safety of the following inter-election season. once you start noticing these unnatural occurrences, aka patterns, you can never unnotice them.

i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.

his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"

walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole. they are pretty much controlled opposition. otherwise please tell me how they are so based by only daring to voice this opinion in june of 2025 (ignoring the fact they all spammed identical-phrased slogan on the same day).

nick predicts that, come the next election year, they will simultaneously withdraw from and renounce these "extreme" views altogether in favour of a much more lenient and progressive take on immigration, only to take up the digital pitchfork once again from the safety of the following inter-election season. once you start noticing these unnatural occurrences, aka patterns, you can never unnotice them.

i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.

his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"

walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole. they are pretty much controlled opposition. otherwise please tell me how they are so based by only daring to voice this opinion in june of 2025 (ignoring the fact they all spammed identical-phrased slogan on the same day).

nick predicts that, come the next election year, they will simultaneously withdraw from and renounce these "extreme" views altogether in favour of a much more lenient and progressive take on immigration, only to take up the digital pitchfork once again from the safety of the following non-election season. once you start noticing these unnatural occurrences, aka patterns, you can never unnotice them.

i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.

his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"

walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole. they are pretty much controlled opposition. otherwise please tell me how they are so based by only daring to voice this opinion in june of 2025 (ignoring the fact they all spammed identical-phrased slogan on the same day).

he predicts that, come the next election year, they will simultaneously withdraw from and renounce these "extreme" views altogether in favour of a much more lenient and progressive take on immigration, only to take up the digital pitchfork once again from the safety of the following non-election season. once you start noticing these unnatural occurrences, aka patterns, you can never unnotice them.

i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.

his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"

walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole. they are pretty much controlled opposition.

he predicts that, come the next election year, they will simultaneously withdraw from and renounce these "extreme" views altogether in favour of a much more lenient and progressive take on immigration, only to take up the digital pitchfork once again from the safety of the following non-election season. once you start noticing these unnatural occurrences, aka patterns, you can never unnotice them.

i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.

his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"

walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole. they are pretty much controlled opposition.

he predicts that, come the next election year, they will simultaneously withdraw from and renounce these "extreme" views altogether in favour of a much more lenient and progressive take on immigration, only to take up the digital pitchfork once again from the safety of the following non-election season.

i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.

his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"

walsh, kirk and poso are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. as based as they get when it comes to racebaiting or appeasing MAGA crowd, they'll never touch the core problem with a 10-foot pole. they are pretty much controlled opposition.

i only started paying attention to what he has to say recently but from what i gather, nick's reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.

his complaint is how these same commentators, barely 6 years earlier, would declare this exact opinion as racist/nazi/white supremacist, and reject it, while now they are all simultaneously broadcasting it, in unison, in the same phrasing/wording, on literally the same day. that disturbs me much more than "mExIcAn fAggOt"

they are gatekeepers, and their "opinions" are entirely manufactured and orchestrated. they are pretty much controlled opposition.

his reason for not voting for trump was because he sees trump as being instrumental in the Greater Israel endgame. and we'll see how this palantir shit plays out, but so far he's been right.