Even if it is functionally the same, so what? How does that prove humans can do something AIs can't? Humans have inherent traits from birth that you could say came from God or ancestry/evolution, and this is akin to prompts baked into the design of an AI. Humans aren't really that spontaneous in my opinion, and LLMs tend to be more creative than most people I know, which is why they're popular for generating ideas, even though that makes the user even less capable of being creative for himself.

Even if it is functionally the same, so what? How does that prove humans can do something AIs can't? Humans have inherent traits from birth that you could say came from God or ancestry/evolution, and this is akin to prompts baked into the design of an AI. Humans aren't really that spontaneous in my opinion, and LLMs tend to be more creative than most people I know, which is why they're popular for generating ideas, even though that makes the user even less capable of being creative for themself.

Even if it is functionally the same, so what? How does that prove humans can do something AIs can't? Humans have inherent traits from birth that you could say came from God or ancestry/evolution, and this is akin to prompts baked into the design of an AI. Humans aren't really that spontaneous in my opinion, and LLMs tend to be more creative than most people I know, which is why they're popular for generating ideas, even though that makes the user even capable of being creative for themself.