"Reddit Tier Atheist berates Jordan Peterson for no real reason"

"Do you believe any of this?" "Well, no" "So what's the point?" I'm on the kid's side at least as far is this exchange is concerned .

Is the correct analysis here. Not sure why that's not obvious to everyone, when it's obvious to an anti-theist.

I'm not sure how you managed to read to situation so poorly. The atheist was right. That's the point. Not about God or religion (they didn't get that far) but about Peterson. Even the evangelicals at NotTheBee were shaking their heads.

Catholics are upset that Peterson didn't scream at the idiot and hit him with the Jesus-Jesus book

Again, this is an inversion.

Edit: I like Carl Benjamin, but his take is entirely focuses on "snotty kid had daddy issues." Calling out a man who shows up to practice Christian apologetics as "really quite nothing" when he won't commit to what he is defending was a killing blow. The kid was spot on; I just don't know if he stumbled into it by accident or he legit knew what's up.

"Reddit Tier Atheist berates Jordan Peterson for no real reason"

"Do you believe any of this?" "Well, no" "So what's the point?" I'm on the kid's side at least as far is this exchange is concerned .

Is the correct analysis here. Not sure why that's not obvious to everyone, when it's obvious to an anti-theist.

I'm not sure how you managed to read to situation so poorly. The atheist was right. That's the point. Not about God or religion (they didn't get that far) but about Peterson. Even the evangelicals at NotTheBee were shaking their heads.

Catholics are upset that Peterson didn't scream at the idiot and hit him with the Jesus-Jesus book

Again, this is an inversion.