What shouldn't OP believe in this post?

That presumes that random images from anonymous people should be believed unless proven otherwise. I don't believe that is a correct presumption. That is reversing the burden of proof.

You're still not answering what OP is wrong about in this image.

Because the criticism was aimed at believing this crap. I don't think it's my job to refute a zero-effort image which the retarded OP did not even create.

But if you want. It's incoherent. Suspicious of what? They can never answer.

What shouldn't OP believe in this post?

That presumes that random images from anonymous people should be believed unless proven otherwise. I don't believe that is a correct presumption. That is reversing the burden of proof.

You're still not answering what OP is wrong about in this image.

Because the criticism was aimed at believing this crap. But if you want. It's incoherent. Suspicious of what? They can never answer.