Wikipedia had a nice article about cultural marxism for quite a while, well researched and provides excellent sources. It was covered up and relabeled a 'conspiracy theory'. Or, remember that time when the paki rape gangs were called a 'moral panic' by the current wikipedia editors? So yes, wikipedia is covering up information. Information that would be inconvenient to your owners.

Your gaslighting is meaningless. Do you know why? Because wikipedia itself held records of this alteration, and the original article is still publicly available via multiple backups.

Why are you trying to divert attention from the censoring of nu-wikipedia? What are you so scared of?

Wikipedia had a nice article about cultural marxism for quite a while, well researched and provides excellent sources. It was covered up and relabeled a 'conspiracy theory'. Or, remember that time when the paki rape gangs were called a 'moral panic' by the current wikipedia editors? So yes, wikipedia is covering up information. Information that would be inconvenient to your owners.

Your gaslighting is meaningless. Do you know why? Because wikipedia itself held records of this alteration, and the original article is still publicly available via multiple backups.

Why are you trying to divert attention from the actions of nu-wikipedia's censorship? What are you so scared of?

Wikipedia had a nice article about cultural marxism for quite a while, well researched and provides excellent sources. It was covered up and relabeled a 'conspiracy theory', like how you attack community members on this site as '9/11 truthers', so yes wikipedia is covering up information. Information that would be inconvenient to your owners.

Your gaslighting is meaningless. Do you know why? Because wikipedia itself held records of this alteration, and the original article is still publicly available via multiple backups.

Why are you trying to divert attention from the actions of nu-wikipedia's censorship? What are you so scared of?

Wikipedia had a nice article about cultural marxism for quite a while, well researched and provides excellent sources. It was covered up and relabeled a 'conspiracy theory', like how you attack community members on this site as '9/11 truthers', so yes wikipedia is covering up information that would be inconvenient to your owners.

Why are you trying to divert attention from that? What are you so scared of?