On the contrary, it's very useful. If he eats you today, that's the end of you. If he'll eat you last, he's eating your enemies and giving you valuable time. That allows you to plot and plan for that eventuality, and prevent it.

More broadly, people are never going to agree with me 100% of the time. To achieve anything, I have to make common cause with people who don't, and support them for as long as they serve my purposes.

Note how Vance backed the guy who said "normalize Indian hate", even though his wife is a "Pajeet".

On the contrary, it's very useful. If he eats you today, that's the end of you. If he'll eat you last, that allows you to plot and plan for that eventuality, and prevent it.

More broadly, people are never going to agree with me 100% of the time. To achieve anything, I have to make common cause with people who don't, and support them for as long as they serve my purposes.

Note how Vance backed the guy who said "normalize Indian hate", even though his wife is a "Pajeet".

On the contrary, it's very useful. If he eats you today, that's the end of you. If he'll eat you last, that allows you to plot and plan for that eventuality, and prevent it.

More broadly, people are never going to agree with me 100% of the time. To achieve anything, I have to make common cause with people who don't, and support them for as long as they serve my purposes.

On the contrary, it's very useful. If he eats you today, that's the end of you. If he'll eat you last, that allows you to plot and plan for that eventuality, and prevent it.