Wrong.

Matt Walsh is making the wrong conclusions with limited data. If you take the issue in totality, what I said is correct. This issue is entirely connected to race.

Other races are still granted their natural rights, to associate with whom they chose, to group up with whom they chose, to collectivize along racial lines, to espouse for their racial interests, to protect themselves from dangers and threats, to protect their neighbors and people, to gatekeep out undesirables. All of these natural rights are being denied White people. A group, regardless of size or purpose, can't exist without the natural rights necessary to maintain that group. If all of the natural rights necessary to maintain a group are being denied to White people, then we, as individuals, families, communities, jobs, churches, states, nations, and as a people, will cease to exist. The demographic trends since the 60s prove this. The rampant anti-White propaganda proves this. The media and government coverup of non-white on White crime proves this. The welfare use of non-whites proves this. The explicit importation of non-whites into White countries proves this. The explicit hiring of non-whites over more competent Whites proves this. The overwhelming number of jobs in recent years only going to non-whites proves this. ESG and DEI proves this. Affirmative action and diversity proves this. The "oppressor vs oppressed" narrative (i.e. Whites = oppressor and non-whites = oppressed) proves this. The media propaganda proves this. The dozens of NGOs specifically funding and helping non-whites get into White countries, en masse, proves this. The demonization of White people in history, if the rules were applied equally to all races, would damn them more, proves this. I can't conjure a single instance in Western civilization, nor all its institutions now, that is explicitly to the benefit of White people. Can you think of one?

On face value, Matt Walsh is correct that, as men, we must be stoics and tolerate a lot of shit, for the greater good of the collective. That's why Western civilization rose to the height that it did, because of our ability to tolerate. But, tolerance, in itself, isn't a virtue. It depends on the situation. If our societies and institutions become corrupt, tolerance is the worst thing we could do. You don't tolerate lies, wrong, and evil, you refute it, correct it, and destroy it.

Matt Walsh, as a mainstream right winger, is intentionally ignoring the larger issues of inflation, and arguing that we keep doing more of the same, work harder and harder to maintain a system that is incredibly corrupt and antagonistic toward us, and our people. That is the wrong position.

Wrong.

Matt Walsh is making the wrong conclusions with limited data. If you take the issue in totality, what I said is correct.

Other races are still granted their natural rights, to associate with whom they chose, to group up with whom they chose, to collectivize along racial lines, to espouse for their racial interests, to protect themselves from dangers and threats, to protect their neighbors and people, to gatekeep out undesirables. All of these natural rights are being denied White people. A group, regardless of size or purpose, can't exist without the natural rights necessary to maintain that group. If all of the natural rights necessary to maintain a group are being denied to White people, then we, as individuals, families, communities, jobs, churches, states, nations, and as a people, will cease to exist. The demographic trends since the 60s prove this. The rampant anti-White propaganda proves this. The media and government coverup of non-white on White crime proves this. The welfare use of non-whites proves this. The explicit importation of non-whites into White countries proves this. The explicit hiring of non-whites over more competent Whites proves this. The overwhelming number of jobs in recent years only going to non-whites proves this. ESG and DEI proves this. Affirmative action and diversity proves this. The "oppressor vs oppressed" narrative (i.e. Whites = oppressor and non-whites = oppressed) proves this. The media propaganda proves this. The dozens of NGOs specifically funding and helping non-whites get into White countries, en masse, proves this. The demonization of White people in history, if the rules were applied equally to all races, would damn them more, proves this. I can't conjure a single instance in Western civilization, nor all its institutions now, that is explicitly to the benefit of White people. Can you think of one?

On face value, Matt Walsh is correct that, as men, we must be stoics and tolerate a lot of shit, for the greater good of the collective. That's why Western civilization rose to the height that it did, because of our ability to tolerate. But, tolerance, in itself, isn't a virtue. It depends on the situation. If our societies and institutions become corrupt, tolerance is the worst thing we could do. You don't tolerate lies, wrong, and evil, you refute it, correct it, and destroy it.

Matt Walsh, as a mainstream right winger, is intentionally ignoring the larger issues of inflation, and arguing that we keep doing more of the same, work harder and harder to maintain a system that is incredibly corrupt and antagonistic toward us, and our people. That is the wrong position.

Wrong.

Matt Walsh is making the wrong conclusions with limited data. If you take the issue in totality, what I said is correct.

Other races are still granted their natural rights, to associate with whom they chose, to group up with whom they chose, to collectivize along racial lines, to espouse for their racial interests, to protect themselves from dangers and threats, to protect their neighbors and people, to gatekeep out undesirables. All of these natural rights are being denied White people. A group, regardless of size or purpose, can't exist without the natural rights necessary to maintain that group. If all of the natural rights necessary to maintain a group are being denied to White people, then we, as individuals, families, communities, jobs, churches, states, nations, and as a people, will cease to exist. The demographic trends since the 60s prove this. The rampant anti-White propaganda proves this. The media and government coverup of non-white on White crime proves this. The welfare use of non-whites proves this.

On face value, Matt Walsh is correct that, as men, we must be stoics and tolerate a lot of shit, for the greater good of the collective. That's why Western civilization rose to the height that it did, because of our ability to tolerate. But, tolerance, in itself, isn't a virtue. It depends on the situation. If our societies and institutions become corrupt, tolerance is the worst thing we could do. You don't tolerate lies, wrong, and evil, you refute it, correct it, and destroy it.

Matt Walsh, as a mainstream right winger, is intentionally ignoring the larger issues of inflation, and arguing that we keep doing more of the same, work harder and harder to maintain a system that is incredibly corrupt and antagonistic toward us, and our people. That is the wrong position.