My point isn't that its impossible to believe, its that the proof presented is insufficient to do so.

To use your example, it had Trunks and Vegeta, two characters we know are in the game, having a direct interaction that makes sense*, meaning it feels like a game script instead of a collection of buzzwords, within the noticeable graphic style of the game they are in, linking it to that specific game.

This has a random black guy with no name, in a generic style with no details, saying a clumsy line that hardly feels like it would pass Voice Acting that we are just being told is from the game.

It could be what it says it is completely, but its not strong enough on its own to just believe it.

*Also while I get why people hate it, that line is 120% fitting with Kid Trunks both in how he talks and his insufferable personality. If he was written now instead of in the 80s he would say shit like "no cap fr fr" and it feels out of place because he hasn't aged in 40 years of the IP existing.

My point isn't that its impossible to believe, its that the proof presented is insufficient to do so.

To use your example, it had Trunks and Vegeta, two characters we know are in the game, having a direct interaction that makes sense, meaning it feels like a game script instead of a collection of buzzwords, within the noticeable graphic style of the game they are in, linking it to that specific game.

This has a random black guy with no name, in a generic style with no details, saying a clumsy line that hardly feels like it would pass Voice Acting that we are just being told is from the game.

It could be what it says it is completely, but its not strong enough on its own to just believe it.