I didn't comment on H1B at all. I was making a statement on legal immigration in general. When I say 100 people, I'm talking about literal genius level talent, the likes of which is limited to a very small handful of people globally. The 0.0001%. I'm not talking about the hordes of 10s of thousands of pajeets.

Bringing in geniuses on the scale of 100s of people annually (in reality it might not even be that many), is not a slow death when it's a country of 300 million people, and it's ridiculous to suggest that it would be.

You've sperged about a lot of things wrong with the current system that I would largely agree with, but it has nothing to do with my comment. Yes, I would absolutely agree that we should be poaching the Norweigan genius as well. As a matter of fact, given the IQ distribution of a lot of the less desirable races, the foreign white or asian (chink not brown) genius should be much more common than the pajeet ones. It's all about creating a system with strict guidelines and ensuring it isn't exploited for uses beyond those that were intended.

I would agree that as executed now, these programs could be scaled down by like 99% or more, and I can't be bothered to go back and forth about where to draw that line within the remaining 1% when we are so far away from what either of us would want at this point. I'm content to just agree that we know which direction things need to be pushed; we can quabble over when to stop pushing later.

I didn't comment on H1B at all. I was making a statement on legal immigration in general. When I say 100 people, I'm talking about literal genius level talent, the likes of which is limited to a very small handful of people globally. The 0.0001%. I'm not talking about the hordes of 10s of thousands of pajeets.

Bringing in geniuses on the scale of 100s of people annually (in reality it might not even be that many), is not a slow death when it's a country of 300 million people, and it's ridiculous to suggest that it would be.

You've sperged about a lot of things wrong with the current system that I would largely agree with, but it has nothing to do with my comment. Yes, I would absolutely agree that we should be poaching the Norweigan genius as well. As a matter of fact, given the IQ distribution of a lot of the less desirable races, the foreign white or asian (chink not brown) genius should be much more common than the pajeet ones. It's all about creating a system with strict guidelines and ensuring it isn't exploited for uses beyond those that were intended.

I would agree that as executed now, these programs could be scaled down by like 99% or more, and I can't be bothered to go back and forth about where to draw that line within the remaining 1% when we are so far away from that either of us would want at this point.

I didn't comment on H1B at all. I was making a statement on legal immigration in general. When I say 100 people, I'm talking about literal genius level talent, the likes of which is limited to a very small handful of people globally. The 0.0001%. I'm not talking about the hordes of 10s of thousands of pajeets.

Bringing in geniuses on the scale of 100s of people annually (in reality it might not even be that many), is not a slow death when it's a country of 300 million people, and it's ridiculous to suggest that it would be.