Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

80% of modern men would be useless, but 98% of modern women would be too.

Frankly, the role of women in a survival environment without rule of law or complex infrastructure is something every single post-apocalypse video game gets wrong. Even before the rise of wokism, I can't think of a single game that ever got it accurately. In real life, women would go back to exactly the style of living they had in say, the 1600s. Exclusively limited to living at home with their parents, or having a husband. The only tasks they would be allowed to do would be safe tasks within the town or family house. No women would be allowed in combat situations of any kind. None. They would go back to cooking, cleaning, raising babies, grinding flour, repairing clothes, etc. And they would beg to be allowed to go back to that. Modern women only have the arrogant uppity chip on their shoulder they do now because they live in a world with very few real dangers and with a massive advanced infrastructure with millions of moving parts all maintained by men keeping them safe, warm, dry, clothed, fed, healthy, entertained, etc. Without that, their natural fear instincts take over and they will be climbing over each other to attach themselves to the strongest man they can find while they stay inside a strong sheltered place waiting for what comes.

Any video game that tried to do it realistically you'd end up with seeing absolutely zero women outside of towns or cities, and the ones you do see in towns would be married, living at home with their father, or working at a whorehouse (the other thing a ton of women will revert to when they realize they have absolutely nothing else to offer the men who will either keep them alive or kill them). There will be no female soldiers, female guards, female convoy escorts, female mayors, female adventurers, etc. The men of their family or town wouldn't let them because they're far too valuable to procreation, and the women wouldn't want to anyways because they'd be far too scared and when it comes down to it they know that they can't actually do anything useful other than raise babies, make food, and spread their legs.

3 days ago
24 score
Reason: None provided.

80% of modern men would be useless, but 98% of modern women would be too.

Frankly, the role of women in a survival environment without rule of law or complex infrastructure is something every single post-apocalypse video game gets wrong. Even before the ride of wokism, I can't think of a single game that ever got it accurately. In real life, women would go back to exactly the style of living they had in say, the 1600s. Exclusively limited to living at home with their parents, or having a husband. The only tasks they would be allowed to do would be safe tasks within the town or family house. No women would be allowed in combat situations of any kind. None. They would go back to cooking, cleaning, raising babies, grinding flower, repairing clothes, etc. And they would beg to be allowed to go back to that. Modern women only have the arrogant uppity chip on their shoulder they do now because they live in a world with very few real dangers and with a massive advanced infrastructure with millions of moving parts all maintained by men keeping them safe, warm, dry, clothed, fed, healthy, entertained, etc. Without that, their natural fear instincts take over and they will be climbing over each other to attach themselves to the strongest man they can find while they stay inside a strong sheltered place waiting for what comes.

Any video game that tried to do it realistically you'd end up with seeing absolutely zero women outside of towns or cities, and the ones you do see in towns would be married, living at home with their father, or working at a whorehouse (the other thing a ton of women will revert to when they realize they have absolutely nothing else to offer the men who will either keep them alive or kill them). There will be no female soldiers, female guards, female convoy escorts, female mayors, female adventurers, etc. the men of their family or town wouldn't let them because they're far too valuable to procreation, and the women wouldn't want to anyways because they'd be far too scared and when it comes down to it they know that they can't actually do anything useful other than raise babies, make food, and spread their legs.

3 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

80% of modern men would be useless, but 98% of modern women would be too.

Frankly, the role of women in a survival environment without rule of law or complex infrastructure is something every single post-apocalypse video game gets wrong. Even before the ride of wokism, I can't think of a single game that ever got it accurately. In real life, women would go back to exactly the style of living they had in say, the 1600s. Exclusively limited to living at home with their parents, or having a husband. The only tasks they would be allowed to do would be safe tasks within the town or family house. No women would be allowed in combat situations of any kind. None. They would go back to cooking, cleaning, raising babies, grinding flower, repairing clothes, etc. And they would beg to be allowed to go back to that. Modern women only have the arrogant uppity chip on their shoulder they do now because they live in a world with very few real dangers and with a massive advanced infrastructure with millions of moving parts all maintained by men keeping them safe, warm, dry, clothed, fed, healthy, entertained, etc. Without that, their natural fear instincts take over and they will be climbing over each other to attach themselves to the strongest man they can find while they stay inside a strong sheltered place waiting for what comes.

3 days ago
1 score