Yes, it's the law in the UK when it comes to certain stuff, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation and other things depending, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned. Even in America though you have situations involving juries and making sure that the process isn't tainted by online speculation among other things.

It's less of a problem for me, I'm a nobody realistically, but for somebody like the lotus eaters because of how many viewers they now get regularly on their livestreams it definitely applies.

Yes, it's the law in the UK when it comes to certain stuff, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation and other things depending, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned. Even in America though you have situations involving juries and making sure that the process isn't tainted by online speculation among other things.

It's less of a problem for me, I'm a nobody realistically, but for somebody like the lotus eaters because of how many viewers they now get regularly on their livestreams it definitely applies.

Yes, it's the law in the UK when it comes to certain stuff, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation and other things depending, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned. Even in America though you have situations involving juries and making sure that the process isn't tainted by online speculation among other things.

Yes, it's the law in the UK when it comes to certain stuff, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation and other things depending, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned. Even in America though you have situations involving juries and making sure that the process isn't tainted by online speculation among other things.

Yes, it's the law in the UK when it comes to certain stuff, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation and other things depending, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned. Even in America though you have situations involving juries and making sure that the process isn't tainted by online speculation among other things.

Yes, it's the law in the UK when it comes to certain stuff, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned. Even in America though you have situations involving juries and making sure that the process isn't tainted by online speculation among other things.

Yes, it's the law in the UK when it comes to certain stuff, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned. Even in America though you have situations involving juries and making sure that the process isn't tainted by online speculation among other things.

Yes, it's the law in the UK, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned. Even in America though you have situations involving juries and making sure that the process isn't tainted by online speculation among other things.

Yes, it's the law in the UK, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned. Even you guys in America though have situations involving juries and making sure that the process isn't tainted by online speculation among other things.

Yes, it's the law in the UK, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

The law isn't bothered about already reported facts, just speculation, when it comes to the ages of the children versus the teenage attacker that's just typical internet pedantry as far as I'm concerned.

Yes, it's the law in the UK, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage child or teenager in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.

Yes, it's the law in the UK, this is why everybody is being so careful, it involves underage people. You're not even allowed in the UK to take photographs of children without parental consent among other things or do film even if it's just public. This is why when you have articles or videos about schools and such in UK media they crop out completely any children or blur them.

Also, imagine if people got the arrested teenager's identity wrong or he wasn't involved and there was something else happening. Another case of retards fucking up the entire thing because they get the red mist and decide to go in without using their brains. Honestly telling about quite a few people who were trying to have a go at me that they didn't think about any of this for five seconds but it looks like I have to spell out all the legal implications here.

When it comes to actual underage in the UK if there's an ongoing criminal case especially the British don't fuck around with the process. Thank you for being one of the few people posting who put two and two together on why even on the anti-woke side and everything they were being extremely careful with their reporting.