• There's no freedom of speech in Canada. You can be convicted of "hate speech" for slurs against trannies.

• There's no academic freedom in Canada - It's illegal for a medical professional to be against "gender-affirming care."

• There's barely any academic freedom in the western world. You can't publish something that goes against the accepted narrative or that "harms marginalized groups" which is where so-called trans people have been categorized. (See "hate speech" above)

• The replication crisis alone is enough to ignore social sciences, predictive sciences, anything in the "soft science" category not easily falsifiable with hard evidence or mathematical proofs. Only the most terminal redditors take life instructions from scientific literature.

• Do they think anyone would believe any news reporter to have actually conducted a full-scale literature review and presented a meta-analysis to support their politics story, rather than just cherry-picking the studies that supported their report? Actually I can accept this one. Most people believe "science says" things and those things are "settled science" until "the science evolved" and then "science now says" new thing. Most people will assume "They consulted the experts!"

• Fact-checking is a fake and gay job.

Everyone still buying this shit are hopeless and willing slaves. I despise them more than the elites who run clown world.

• There's no freedom of speech in Canada. You can be convicted of "hate speech" for slurs against trannies.

• There's no academic freedom in Canada - It's illegal for a medical professional to be against "gender-affirming care."

• There's barely any academic freedom in the western world. You can't publish something that goes against the accepted narrative or that "harms marginalized groups" which is where so-called trans people have been categorized. (See "hate speech" above)

• Do they think anyone would believe any news reporter to have actually conducted a full-scale literature review and presented a meta-analysis to support their politics story, rather than just cherry-picking the studies that supported their report? Actually I can accept this one. Most people believe "science says" things and those things are "settled science" until "the science evolved" and then "science now says" new thing. Most people will assume "They consulted the experts!"

• Fact-checking is a fake and gay job

Everyone still buying this shit are hopeless and willing slaves. I despise them more than the elites who run clown world.

• There's no freedom of speech in Canada. You can be convicted of "hate speech" for slurs against trannies.

• There's academic freedom in Canada - It's illegal for a medical professional to be against "gender-affirming care."

• There's barely any academic freedom in the western world. You can't publish something that goes against the accepted narrative or that "harms marginalized groups" which is where so-called trans people have been categorized. (See "hate speech" above)

• Do they think anyone would believe any news reporter to have actually conducted a full-scale literature review and presented a meta-analysis to support their politics story, rather than just cherry-picking the studies that supported their report? Actually I can accept this one. Most people believe "science says" things and those things are "settled science" until "the science evolved" and then "science now says" new thing. Most people will assume "They consulted the experts!"

• Fact-checking is a fake and gay job

Everyone still buying this shit are hopeless and willing slaves. I despise them more than the elites who run clown world.