I doubt a single person here can explain why Palestinians existing is in any way positive.
You can say that for almost any group.
Generally the problem with genocide is that you are targeting a group with potential...to better the human race which is why it is an atrocity.
If you're an absolute fucking sociopath, sure.
By all means though prove me wrong.
I don't have to; you could for the sake of argument be absolutely correct, but still be wrong on murdering innocent men, women, and children being the just thing to do. Even if they were 'low quality' men, women, and children.
Show me why a violent group of backwards nomads deserves to exist in an overcrowded world. Someone convince me that they have made any positive impact towards humanity as a people.
Convince me you have any positive impact towards humanity. Convince me anyone here has that positive impact. Most people in general do not. If we're going by your criteria, it's time to wipe out 90% of most peoples.
I don't believe we should require such proof to merit mere existence. That's an incredibly stupid prospect, and any enforcement of such an idea - no matter who carries it out - is going to be a fucking disaster.
But, hey, you do you.
EDIT: Ah, yes, the controversial "anti-genocide" take.
I doubt a single person here can explain why Palestinians existing is in any way positive.
You can say that for almost any group.
Generally the problem with genocide is that you are targeting a group with potential...to better the human race which is why it is an atrocity.
If you're an absolute fucking sociopath, sure.
By all means though prove me wrong.
I don't have to; you could for the sake of argument be absolutely correct, but still be wrong on murdering innocent men, women, and children being the just thing to do. Even if they were 'low quality' men, women, and children.
Show me why a violent group of backwards nomads deserves to exist in an overcrowded world. Someone convince me that they have made any positive impact towards humanity as a people.
Convince me you have any positive impact towards humanity. Convince me anyone here has that positive impact. Most people in general do not. If we're going by your criteria, it's time to wipe out 90% of most peoples.
I don't believe we should require such proof to merit mere existence. That's an incredibly stupid prospect, and any enforcement of such an idea - no matter who carries it out - is going to be a fucking disaster.
But, hey, you do you.