Oh my god, another one. That makes two of you unmitigated fucking retards that doesn't understand that there's more than one death camp

I, and all other Holocaust "deniers", well understand the official position. We're well aware that the "official" Holocaust account says there was more than one death camp. We can disprove the numbers of dead under the official accounts in totality (adding up the crematoria of all death camps), or by individual "death" camps. Not sure why you think that I think there was only one camp.

and more than one method of execution, and more than one way of disposing of corpses.

Typical. Pro Holocaust narrative pushers never, ever, acknowledge that they have to perpetually change the "truth" of the events to account for holes in their theory. The official Holocaust narrative has always said the primary method of execution was gassing, and the primary way of body disposal was cremation. There's no getting around this. It's been beaten into the heads of every single Westerner since Holocaust propaganda became prevalent around the 70s (odd that it didn't start right after the discoveries of all those "death camps" at the latter parts of WW2, or right after WW2), it's been the primary messaging of the Holocaust, and taught in all Western schools. If you admit that your pet theory has to be continually adjusted, then you're tacitly suggesting that your theory is wrong.

You can't deboonk the holocaust because you literally don't know anything about it.

What a strange assertion, when I know more about your theory than you do, or more than you claim. You've already bought into the adjustments to the theory to prevent it from being completely debunked.

This includes your insane comments about rollercoasters. What you don't realize (because you've never looked into the holocaust) is that the only people who have ever said anything about that shit are Holocaust Deniers.

Wrong. Jews were the ones that made those ridiculous claims. Quotes, pictures, and sources have been posted tons all over the chans (pretty much the main free speech forums that were able to discuss this topic) for years and years.

No legitimate source has ever mentioned any of that shit.

LOL. Classic. Appeal to authority fallacy. "Only sources that say what I want are 'legitimate'". Double LOL.

Have you completely ignored the last 3 years of Covid lies? The governments, media, pharmaceutical and medical industries, all over the world, straight up lied to people, repeatedly, for years, leading to the deaths of thousands, or millions (hard to tell given how much they've censored, covered up, and lied about). You're actually suggesting that people are incapable of lying, in "official" sources, "legitimate" studies, "concrete" evidence. Triple LOL.

Actually atrocities like removing gold fillings, stealing all jewelry, forced prostitution, pressure chamber experiments, chemical experiments, random murders, and the mass executions are all verifiable.

Governments have never, ever lied. Governments have never, ever lied about their political opponents, wartime opponents, or created straw men caricatures of either, or conjured fake evidence to paint their opponents in negative light. Governments have never, ever lied to their own people, or used propaganda to get their people to think the way they want. Good lord you're dense.

but you don't know the literal thousands of bodies and skeletons that were dumped into mass graves

Hey, thanks for acknowledging that thousands of bodies were found, a number absurdly, drastically short of the claimed millions of dead. A tacit admission, but a welcome one. You're too dense to see it though, considering you thought that argument worked in your favor. Holocaust "deniers" already acknowledge that lots of people died in WW2. Big shocker! We already acknowledge that mass graves exist, but are accounted by the dead from the war, not from extermination camps.

I'm citing witnesses.

Witnesses that have been repeatedly caught lying. Furthermore, actual experts and witnesses that say things contrary to the official Holocaust narrative have been censored, attacked, and had their lives ruined. Why do you believe the "official" witnesses, but not the people who had their lives ruined? What about the expert leaders of the Allies (Eisenhower, Churchill, and de Gaulle) who wrote memoirs after WW2, and not one of them mentioned the Holocaust, the mass extermination of jews and other undesirables by the evil Nazis? Wouldn't those experts want to claim credit for defeating the evil Nazis and saving all the people they planned to exterminate? Weird. Are you not admitting your own bias, only wanting to believe people who support your position, but ignore everyone else?

I'm citing the accused.

You mean the Nazis that gave confessions under duress of torture? You mean the Nazis that wrote confessions in languages they couldn't speak? You mean the "evidence" that could be conjured up from thin air because all Western legal precedent for fair trials was thrown out the window at Nuremberg?

Again, your ignorance of the event is a refutation of your calculation. You are more back-asswards on this than the people that said Kyle Rittenhouse shot 4 black people in a mass shooting in Kenosha. You literally do not understand enough of the basics of the event to accurately criticize it.

Admit that you're afraid of even asking me to refute the numbers based on simple math, and we can move on. Or, have the courage to challenge your own theory by asking me to do it. I dare you. That, or tacitly admit that you're an intellectual coward, incapable of admitting you're wrong, or even challenging your own ideas and beliefs.

Oh my god, another one. That makes two of you unmitigated fucking retards that doesn't understand that there's more than one death camp

I, and all other Holocaust "deniers", well understand the official position. We're well aware that the "official" Holocaust account says there was more than one death camp. We can disprove the numbers of dead under the official accounts in totality (adding up the crematoria of all death camps), or by individual "death" camps. Not sure why you think that I think there was only one camp.

and more than one method of execution, and more than one way of disposing of corpses.

Typical. Pro Holocaust narrative pushers never, ever, acknowledge that they have to perpetually change the "truth" of the events to account for holes in their theory. The official Holocaust narrative has always said the primary method of execution was gassing, and the primary way of body disposal was cremation. There's no getting around this. It's been beaten into the heads of every single Westerner since Holocaust propaganda became prevalent around the 70s (odd that it didn't start right after the discoveries of all those "death camps" at the latter parts of WW2, or right after WW2), it's been the primary messaging of the Holocaust, and taught in all Western schools. If you admit that your pet theory has to be continually adjusted, then you're tacitly suggesting that your theory is wrong.

You can't deboonk the holocaust because you literally don't know anything about it.

What a strange assertion, when I know more about your theory than you do, or more than you claim. You've already bought into the adjustments to the theory to prevent it from being completely debunked.

This includes your insane comments about rollercoasters. What you don't realize (because you've never looked into the holocaust) is that the only people who have ever said anything about that shit are Holocaust Deniers.

Wrong. Jews were the ones that made those ridiculous claims. Quotes, pictures, and sources have been posted tons all over the chans (pretty much the main free speech forums that were able to discuss this topic) for years and years.

No legitimate source has ever mentioned any of that shit.

LOL. Classic. Appeal to authority fallacy. "Only sources that say what I want are 'legitimate'". Double LOL.

Have you completely ignored the last 3 years of Covid lies? The governments, media, pharmaceutical and medical industries, all over the world, straight up lied to people, repeatedly, for years, leading to the deaths of thousands, or millions (hard to tell given how much they've censored, covered up, and lied about). You're actually suggesting that people are incapable of lying, in "official" sources, "legitimate" studies, "concrete" evidence. Triple LOL.

Actually atrocities like removing gold fillings, stealing all jewelry, forced prostitution, pressure chamber experiments, chemical experiments, random murders, and the mass executions are all verifiable.

Governments have never, ever lied. Governments have never, ever lied about their political opponents, wartime opponents, or created straw men caricatures of either, or conjured fake evidence to paint their opponents in negative light. Governments have never, ever lied to their own people, or used propaganda to get their people to think the way they want. Good lord you're dense.

but you don't know the literal thousands of bodies and skeletons that were dumped into mass graves

Hey, thanks for acknowledging that thousands of bodies were found, a number absurdly, drastically short of the claimed millions of dead. A tacit admission, but a welcome one. You're too dense to see it though, considering you thought that argument worked in your favor. Holocaust "deniers" already acknowledge that lots of people died in WW2. Big shocker! We already acknowledge that mass graves exist, but are accounted by the dead from the war, not from extermination camps.

I'm citing witnesses.

Witnesses that have been repeatedly caught lying. Furthermore, actual experts and witnesses that say things contrary to the official Holocaust narrative have been censored, attacked, and had their lives ruined. Why do you believe the "official" witnesses, but not the people who had their lives ruined? Are you not admitting your own bias?

I'm citing the accused.

You mean the Nazis that gave confessions under duress of torture? You mean the Nazis that wrote confessions in languages they couldn't speak? You mean the "evidence" that could be conjured up from thin air because all Western legal precedent for fair trials was thrown out the window at Nuremberg?

Again, your ignorance of the event is a refutation of your calculation. You are more back-asswards on this than the people that said Kyle Rittenhouse shot 4 black people in a mass shooting in Kenosha. You literally do not understand enough of the basics of the event to accurately criticize it.

Admit that you're afraid of even asking me to refute the numbers based on simple math, and we can move on. Or, have the courage to challenge your own theory by asking me to do it. I dare you. That, or tacitly admit that you're an intellectual coward, incapable of admitting you're wrong, or even challenging your own ideas and beliefs.