If it's race-based, I wholeheartedly agree. Of course, assessing based on income or socioeconimic status could just become a proxy for race.

To your point on supply and demand, I'd tend to agree as well except that we're facing extremely high immigration rates. Also, keep in mind that these policies actually favour developers. They now get to build fewer homes but make as much money as they otherwise would because the prices have been ballooning that quickly (prices have effectively doubled in five years).

It looks like the most practical approach now is to just leave, but people fleeing doesn't improve the situation.

If it's race-based, I wholeheartedly agree. Of course, assessing based on income or socioeconimic status could just become a proxy for race.

To your point on supply and demand, I'd tend to agree as well except that we're facing extremely high immigration rates. Also, keep in mind that these policies actually favour developers. They now get to build fewer homes but make as much money as they otherwise would because the prices have been ballooning that quickly (prives have effectively doubled in five years).

It looks like the most practical approach now is to just leave, but people fleeing doesn't improve the situation.

If it's race-based, I wholeheartedly agree. Of course, assessing based on income or socioeconimic status could just become a proxy for race.

To your point on supply and demand, I'd tend to agree as well except that we're facing extremely high immigration rates. It looks like the most practical approach now is to just leave.

If it's race-based, I wholeheartedly agree. Of course, assessing based on income or socioeconimic status could just become a proxy for race.