Uh huh. The stuff that theoretically taxes go for. But what about "their share" of the welfare and graft?

And to put it simply the case for cronyism, a lot of people would like to not pay these taxes and instead provide for themselves. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. And I assume Florida Man to borrow from another thread is not qualified for these breaks.

You could call it business friendly. Don't get me wrong as basically a libertarian I'm not happy about the government taking in money. Just seems like a fairness issue for an an issue of the distribution of the tax burden. However, if the case is the corporations don't pay taxes but the people that take the profits do that can be fine.

Uh huh. The stuff that theoretically taxes go for. But what about "their share" of the welfare and graft?

And to put it simply the case for cronyism, a lot of people would like to not pay these taxes and instead provide for themselves. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. And I assume Florida Man to borrow from another thread is not qualified for these breaks.

You could call it business friendly. Don't get me wrong as basically a libertarian I'm not happy about the government taking in money. Just seems like a fairness issue for an an issue of the distribution of the tax burden. However, if the case is the corporations don't pay taxes but the people do that seems fine.

Uh huh. The stuff that theoretically taxes go for. But what about "their share" of the welfare and graft?

And to put it simply the case for cronyism, a lot of people would like to not pay these taxes and instead provide for themselves. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. And I assume Florida Man to borrow from another thread is not qualified for these breaks.