Nah, it was Harry getting briefly involved with one of the Paki sisters. Fortunately, he smartened up later.

So far in the game, the only mention of "purebloods" had to do with a mention of someone with the surname Gaunt, which would be one of Tom Riddle's direct ancestors, anyway. At the time, it should have been considered nothing more than a mere personal choice as to whom one married; I seem to recall the books laying the whole pureblood thing directly on Voldemort's shoulders (as being a shit-raiser.) At worst, it would have been looked at in a more tribalist sense before Darwin, in the same sense that royal families made the mistake of wanting to keep things to the nearest family possible, or the multi-generational cousin-marriage we see in modern tribalist societies (which would make sense given that they're all literally inter-related, with maybe very little fresh blood, such as the Grangers.)

Nah, it was Harry getting briefly involved with one of the Paki sisters. Fortunately, he smartened up later.

So far in the game, the only mention of "purebloods" had to do with a mention of someone with the surname Gaunt, which would be one of Tom Riddle's direct ancestors, anyway. At the time, it should have been considered nothing more than a mere personal choice as to whom one married; I seem to recall the books laying the whole pureblood thing directly on Voldemort's shoulders (as being a shit-raiser.) At worst, it would have been looked at in a more tribalist sense before Darwin, in the same sense that royal families made the mistake of wanting to keep things to the nearest family possible.