I do doubt a certain kernel in your worldview, but if I'm your biggest doubter you just aren't talking to enough people.

Insofar as opposing what you say/do, I don't want young men to feel like they shouldn't start families. I should stop pecking at you past that line though, and I think you scew me wrongly as some top skeptic, because I believe feminism is a symptom of the world's ills and that the world does need people like you. It really doesn't set us so far apart. In my mind.

I have said this more succinctly in a recent thread where people were bitching about you, but as I see it, you take offense at my opinion that fems lack the agency to be the "big-bad", to state it in video game terms. And basically this takes priority over the common ground we have, in a way that I don't think my taking issue with your antinatalist underpinnings does.

My answer to the topic at hand is easy. You don't solve counterterrorism budget flow by becoming emasculated for the comfort of people who are targeting you (and who will always target you in literally any case). The strategy you suggest is to deny something that is true, and then work on making it true, in CONFORMANCE with the desires of those orchestrating the situation.

The strategy I suggest is to accept one's natural gifts, work to enhance them, and then use those gifts in direct DEFIANCE of those people.

Bearing in mind for comprehension that we believe those groups are different groups. I would not suggest mcviolencing a woman over politics. I would suggest organizing against a rootless international cabal of financiers, though.

I do doubt a certain kernel in your worldview, but if I'm your biggest doubter you just aren't talking to enough people.

Insofar as opposing what you say/do, I don't want young men to feel like they shouldn't start families. I should stop pecking at you past that line though, and I think you scew me wrongly as some top skeptic, because I believe feminism is a symptom of the world's ills and that the world does need people like you. It really doesn't set us so far apart. In my mind.

I have said this more succinctly in a recent thread where people were bitching about you, but as I see it, you take offense at my opinion that fems lack the agency to be the "big-bad", to state it in video game terms. And basically this takes priority over the common ground we have, in a way that I don't think my taking issue with your antinatalist underpinnings does.

My answer to the topic at hand is easy. You don't solve counterterrorism budget flow by becoming emasculated for the comfort of people who are targeting you (and who will always target you in literally any case). The strategy you suggest is to deny something that is true, and then work on making it true, in CONFORMANCE with the desires of those orchestrating the situation.

The strategy I suggest is to accept one's natural gifts, work to enhance them, and then use those gifts in direct DEFIANCE of those people.

Bearing in mind for comprehension that we believe those groups are different groups. I would not suggest mcviolencing a woman over politics. I would suggest organizing against a rootless cabal of international legacy financiers, though.

I do doubt a certain kernel in your worldview, but if I'm your biggest doubter you just aren't talking to enough people.

Insofar as opposing what you say/do, I don't want young men to feel like they shouldn't start families. I should stop pecking at you past that line though, and I think you scew me wrongly as some top skeptic, because I believe feminism is a symptom of the world's ills and that the world does need people like you. It really doesn't set us so far apart. In my mind.

I have said this more succinctly in a recent thread where people were bitching about you, but as I see it, you take offense at my opinion, that fems lack the agency to be the "big-bad", to state it in video game terms. And basically this takes priority over the common ground we have, in a way that I don't think my taking issue with your antinatalist underpinnings does.

My answer to the topic at hand is easy. You don't solve counterterrorism budget flow by becoming emasculated for the comfort of people who are targeting you (and who will always target you in literally any case). The strategy you suggest is to deny something that is true, and then work on making it true, in CONFORMANCE with the desires of those orchestrating the situation.

The strategy I suggest is to accept one's natural gifts, work to enhance them, and then use those gifts in direct DEFIANCE of those people.

Bearing in mind for comprehension that we believe those groups are different groups. I would not suggest mcviolencing a woman over politics. I would suggest organizing against a rootless cabal of international legacy financiers, though.

I do doubt a certain kernel in your worldview, but if I'm your biggest doubter you just aren't talking to enough people.

Insofar as opposing what you say/do, I don't want young men to feel like they shouldn't start families. I should stop pecking at you past that line though, and I think you scew me wrongly as some top skeptic, because I believe feminism is a symptom of the world's ills and that the world does need people like you. It really doesn't set us so far apart. In my mind.

I have said this more succinctly in a recent thread where people were bitching about you, but as I see it, you take offense at my opinion, that fems lack the agency to be the "big-bad", to state it in video game terms. And basically this takes priority over the common ground we have, in a way that I don't think my taking issue with your antinatalist underpinnings does.

My answer to the topic at hand is easy. You don't solve counterterrorism budget flow by becoming emasculated. The strategy you suggest is to deny something that is true, and then work on making it true, in CONFORMANCE with the desires of those orchestrating the situation.