One more delusion? Suits you.
Cope and seethe, clotblood.
And I told you I don't speak retard. Define your terms, if your meager capabilities allow you to.
And I told you, I have no intent on ever being reasonable to clotshot pushers.
Fortunately, we have archives, but you're not linking any... and it's obvious why.
You'll just call it a blog post anyway. I know your kind.
Laughing at you for your imbecilic sperging is definitely something only corporate shills would do.
Tell you what, you go and approacha 10 random people, tell them that you call people who took the vaccine "SHUT THE FUCK UP CLOTBLOODED MURDERER SCUM."
And see if you regard you as the genius you think you are, or as a dangerously unhinged lunatic who sounds like he is having a stroke, mkay?
Nah. That's your own dishonest take. You studiously avoid the fact that I label clotshot pushers as clotsblooded murderer scum because that's what your entire argument is built up on.
That was not your claim though. This was: "when evidence exists to prove that their so-called vaccines don't even provide the correct threshold of immunization necessary to be called a vaccine." I note that even you were roundly mopcked for being unable to present any evidence, you still were unable to do so. Surprising!
I see you haven't read their own papers. Secondly, you miss the part where I told you in no uncertain terms that I have no intent to humor the dishonesty of a clotshot pusher. Third, you wanted a 'blog post' to corroborate what I said, when I prefer scientific evidence and observation over the gibbering of so-called "experts".
There is none, nor do I regard him as a 'Bad Man'. I have in fact defended his free speech. That said, you are not someone who thinks for himself, or is able to make such judgments for himself. That is what I am mocking.
Cope and seethe some more.
It is fairly boring when your mouth moves and other people's opinions exit. Can yoiu do better?
Ha. You're just mad that I'm taking apart your shitty arguments, clotshot pusher.
You can only argue against a strawman. The Branch Covidians, although they are slightly less loony than you are. That is why you have to scream "MURDERER" at anyone who disagrees with you, cause your batty ass cannot hold his own in an actual argument.
You can't even argue for your own points. Reduced to mockery and deceit the moment I bought up just how dishonest your entire argument was, you pull out a swiss army knife's worth of buzzwords to distract from the fact that you expected me to post links to 'some blog post' so you could pretend that it wasn't real.
You're a liar and a fraud whose only shtick is lying about others when your own argument is sunk. Enjoy your myocarditis.
One more delusion? Suits you.
Cope and seethe, clotblood.
And I told you I don't speak retard. Define your terms, if your meager capabilities allow you to.
And I told you, I have no intent on ever being reasonable to clotshot pushers.
Fortunately, we have archives, but you're not linking any... and it's obvious why.
You'll just call it a blog post anyway. I know your kind.
Laughing at you for your imbecilic sperging is definitely something only corporate shills would do.
Tell you what, you go and approacha 10 random people, tell them that you call people who took the vaccine "SHUT THE FUCK UP CLOTBLOODED MURDERER SCUM."
And see if you regard you as the genius you think you are, or as a dangerously unhinged lunatic who sounds like he is having a stroke, mkay?
Nah. That's your own dishonest take. You studiously avoid the fact that I label clotshot pushers as clotsblooded murderer scum because that's what your entire argument is built up on.
That was not your claim though. This was: "when evidence exists to prove that their so-called vaccines don't even provide the correct threshold of immunization necessary to be called a vaccine." I note that even you were roundly mopcked for being unable to present any evidence, you still were unable to do so. Surprising!
I see you haven't read their own papers. Secondly, you miss the part where I told you in no uncertain terms that I have no intent to humor the dishonesty of a clotshot pusher.
There is none
Backpedaling again?
You can only argue against a strawman. The Branch Covidians, although they are slightly less loony than you are. That is why you have to scream "MURDERER" at anyone who disagrees with you, cause your batty ass cannot hold his own in an actual argument.
Ha, you can't even argue for your own points. Reduced to mockery and deceit the moment I bought up just how dishonest your entire argument was, you pull out a swiss army knife's worth of buzzwords to distract from the fact that you expected me to post links to 'some blog post' so you could pretend that it wasn't real.
You're a liar and a fraud whose only shtick is lying about others when your own argument is sunk. Enjoy your myocarditis.
One more delusion? Suits you.
Cope and seethe, clotblood.
And I told you I don't speak retard. Define your terms, if your meager capabilities allow you to.
And I told you, I have no intent on ever being reasonable to clotshot pushers.
Fortunately, we have archives, but you're not linking any... and it's obvious why.
You'll just call it a blog post anyway. I know your kind.
Laughing at you for your imbecilic sperging is definitely something only corporate shills would do.
Tell you what, you go and approacha 10 random people, tell them that you call people who took the vaccine "SHUT THE FUCK UP CLOTBLOODED MURDERER SCUM."
And see if you regard you as the genius you think you are, or as a dangerously unhinged lunatic who sounds like he is having a stroke, mkay?
Nah. That's your own dishonest take. You studiously avoid the fact that I label clotshot pushers clotsblooded murderer scum.
That was not your claim though. This was: "when evidence exists to prove that their so-called vaccines don't even provide the correct threshold of immunization necessary to be called a vaccine." I note that even you were roundly mopcked for being unable to present any evidence, you still were unable to do so. Surprising!
I see you haven't read their own papers.
There is none
Backpedaling again?
You can only argue against a strawman. The Branch Covidians, although they are slightly less loony than you are. That is why you have to scream "MURDERER" at anyone who disagrees with you, cause your batty ass cannot hold his own in an actual argument.
Ha, you can't even argue for your own points. Reduced to mockery and deceit the moment I bought up just how dishonest your entire argument was, you pull out a swiss army knife's worth of buzzwords to distract from the fact that you expected me to post links to 'some blog post' so you could pretend that it wasn't real.
You're a liar and a fraud whose only schtick is lying about others when your own argument is sunk. Enjoy your myocarditis.
One more delusion? Suits you.
Cope and seethe, clotblood.
And I told you I don't speak retard. Define your terms, if your meager capabilities allow you to.
And I told you, I have no intent on ever being reasonable to clotshot pushers.
Fortunately, we have archives, but you're not linking any... and it's obvious why.
You'll just call it a blog post anyway. I know your kind.
Laughing at you for your imbecilic sperging is definitely something only corporate shills would do.
Tell you what, you go and approacha 10 random people, tell them that you call people who took the vaccine "SHUT THE FUCK UP CLOTBLOODED MURDERER SCUM."
And see if you regard you as the genius you think you are, or as a dangerously unhinged lunatic who sounds like he is having a stroke, mkay?
Nah. That's your own dishonest take. You studiously avoid the fact that I label clotshot pushers clotsblooded murderer scum.
That was not your claim though. This was: "when evidence exists to prove that their so-called vaccines don't even provide the correct threshold of immunization necessary to be called a vaccine." I note that even you were roundly mopcked for being unable to present any evidence, you still were unable to do so. Surprising!
I see you haven't read their own papers.
Ha, you can't even argue for your own points. Reduced to mockery and deceit the moment I bought up just how dishonest your entire argument was, you pull out a swiss army knife's worth of buzzwords to distract from the fact that you expected me to post links to 'some blog post' so you could pretend that it wasn't real.
There is none
Backpedaling again?
You can only argue against a strawman. The Branch Covidians, although they are slightly less loony than you are. That is why you have to scream "MURDERER" at anyone who disagrees with you, cause your batty ass cannot hold his own in an actual argument.
You're a liar and a fraud who's reduced to openly lying about others when your own argument is sunk. Enjoy your myocarditis, clotblood.
Ha, you can't even argue for your own points. Reduced to mockery and deceit the moment I bought up just how dishonest your entire argument was, you pull out a swiss army knife's worth of buzzwords to distract from the fact that you expected me to post links to 'some blog post' so you could pretend that it wasn't real.
You're a liar and a fraud who's reduced to openly lying about others when your own argument is sunk. Enjoy your myocarditis, clotblood.
Ha, you can't even argue for your own points. The moment I bought up just how dishonest your entire argument was, you pull out a swiss army knife's worth of buzzwords to distract from the fact that you expected me to post links to 'some blog post' so you could pretend that it wasn't real.
Remain saddled by the so-called 'experts' if you must. It is a suitable fate for your kind.
Ha, you can't even argue for your own points.
As expected of your kind.
Lots of big words and dodging for a clotshot pusher. As expected of your kind.
Lots of big words and dodging for a clotshot pusher. I find you guilty, and your body will carry out the sentence. Enjoy your myocarditis.