A spy for whom? At the expense of whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume, with almost overt incentive, which seems to be a lot more line with this current topical fixation on AI and getting pissy at artists for defending themselves - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one, where my contributions are often well regarded. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity down to my obssessive compulsive edits.
A spy for whom? At the expense of whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume, with almost overt incentive, which seems to be a lot more line with this current topical fixation on AI and getting pissy at artists defending themselves - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one, where my contributions are often well regarded. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity down to my obssessive compulsive edits.
A spy for whom? At the expense of whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume, with almost overt incentive, which seems to be a lot more line with this current topical fixation on AI and getting pissy at artists defending themselves- all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one, where my contributions are often well regarded. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity down to my obssessive compulsive edits.
A spy for whom? At the expense of whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume, with almost overt incentive, which seems to be a lot more line with this strange topical fixation - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one, where my contributions are often well regarded. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity down to my obssessive compulsive edits.
A spy for whom? At the expense of whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume, which seems to be a lot more line with this strange topical fixation - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one, where my contributions are often well regarded. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity down to my obssessive compulsive edits.
A spy for whom? At the expense of whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume, which seems to be a lot more line with this topical fixation - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one, where my contributions are often well regarded. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity down to my obssessive compulsive edits.
A spy for whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume, which seems to be a lot more line with this topical fixation - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one, where my contributions are often well regarded. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity down to my obssessive compulsive edits.
A spy for whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one, where my contributions are often well regarded. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity down to my obssessive compulsive edits.
A spy for whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity down to my obssessive compulsive edits.
A spy for whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one. Every single one of my points aligns with pinpoint accuity.
A spy for whom? I have seen people come here with brand new accounts trying to seed things into the zeitgeist by volume - all I've offered is argumentation on the basis of personal experience and I again, point to the testimony of my previous account wherein which I offer commentary on a broad set of topics not just this one. Every single one of my points align with pinpoint accuity.