Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escaped to Cambodia.

Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?

A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse?

The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.

This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the same French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did take and held then Hanoi right to the end, and it just didn't matter).

That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.

It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam

Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escaped to Cambodia.

Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?

A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse?

The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.

This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the same French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did take easily and held then Hanoi right to the end, and it just didn't matter).

That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.

It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam

Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escaped to Cambodia.

Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?

A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse?

The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.

This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the dane French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did take easily and held then Hanoi right to the end, and it just didn't matter).

That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.

It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam

Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escaped to Cambodia.

Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?

A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse?

The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.

This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the dane French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did take easily and held Hanoi right to the end, and it just didn't matter).

That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.

It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam

Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escaped to Cambodia.

Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?

A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse?

The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.

This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the dane French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did easily and held Hanoi right to the end, and it didn't matter in the least).

That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.

It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam

Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escape to Cambodia.

Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?

A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse?

The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.

This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the dane French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did easily and held Hanoi right to the end, and it didn't matter in the least).

That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.

It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam

Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escape to Cambodia.

Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?

A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse?

The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.

This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the dane French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did easily and held Hanoi right to the end, and it didn't matter in the keast).

That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.

It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam

Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escape to Cambodia.

Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?

A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse

Firebase Ripcord, "but the K/S ratio"?

The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.

This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the dane French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did easily and held Hanoi right to the end, and it didn't matter in the keast).

That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.

It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam

Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escape to Cambodia.

Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?

A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse?

The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.

This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the dane French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did easily and held Hanoi right to the end, and it didn't matter in the keast).

That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.

It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam

Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.

1 year ago
1 score