That's ewhy I was trying to define it down without using The Dreaded R Word. Putting useful but oddball evolutionary variances under "autism" is very disengenuous, I think, and came exactly from the defenders of the brain-dead droolers. I have known for a long time that "science" is extremely biased/apolagetic/double-standarded when it comes to humans ... fucking Gould was a stand-out example of that. (He'd probably be crowing on the one hand about how "puncutated equilibrium" has more or less been proving itself (or at least, that evolution can happen at the sub-species level a lot faster than originally postulated), but on the other still insisting that humans haven't had enough time to produce biological races on the other.)

Anyway, speaking of which, anyone else think that Social Media Challenges are someone setting Darwinian Retard Traps? The newest one is apparently "cooking chicken in Ny-Quil". Who would even think of that? And how does someone not stop and consider how dumb that is - unless they're in a whole crowd of "friends" yelling "do it do it do it"?

That's ewhy I was trying to define it down without using The Dreaded R Word. Putting useful but oddball evolutionary variances under "autism" is very disengenuous, I think, and came exactly from the defenders of the brain-dead droolers. I have known for a long time that "science" is extremely biased/apolagetic/double-standarded when it comes to humans ... fucking Gould was a stand-out example of that. (He'd probably be crowing on the one hand about how "puncutated equilibrium" has more or less been proving itself (or at least, that evolution can happen at the sub-species level a lot faster than originally postulated), but on the other still insisting that humans haven't had enough time to produce biological races on the other.)