What is ironic is that when we argue for censorship we're honest and point out that what we want done would unironically improve media quality.

An example of this would be censoring regressive leftist bullshit and related garbage by altering lines to make them apolitical, such as by replacing the word "sexist" with "pervert" to remove non-negative references to objectification theory.

What is ironic is that when we argue for censorship where honest and point out that what we want done would unironically improve media quality.

An example of this would be censoring regressive leftist bullshit and related garbage by altering lines to make them apolitical, such as by replacing the word "sexist" with "pervert" to remove non-negative references to objectification theory.

What is ironic is that when we argue for censorship where honest and point out what we want done would unironically improve media quality.

An example of this would be censoring regressive leftist bullshit and related garbage by altering lines to make them apolitical, such as by replacing the word "sexist" with "pervert" to remove non-negative references to objectification theory.

What is ironic is that when we argue for censorship where honest and point out what we want done would unironically improve media quality.