Abrahamic religion compare to other religions is good for enforcing monogamy, that's another reason why so many guys that can't lock down women like it and why nazis (who supported racial eugenics and definitely believed not everyone should breed) were also against it, portraying Abrahamic religion as a dysgenic force.

I think Islam does it better, and if it weren't for such wavering beliefs in the nuclear family and if the world permitted that we exchange daughters and married before whoredom sets in, then things would be manageable. Should everyone marry? Perhaps not, I don't think that's a new thought either. Nevertheless I think the old American system worked well enough, boundaries were intact and respectability within the household meant you avoided marrying a dysgenic shitbag, but then every institution got infiltrated. Even Hitler and the might of the third reich couldn't save mother Europa from that same fate.

Abrahamic religion has done a lot of a damage to the world and atheists, pagans and polytheists have been right about that. Support for funding the state of Israel no matter what wouldn't exist if not for Judaism and Christianity. Islamic terror wouldn't occur if the basis hadn't been laid with the prior foundations of Christianity and Judaism, which Islam borrows heavily from and which justified a lot of messed up things through supposed revelation from angels, something other religions didn't focus so much on.

I think this would have happened one way or the other given the nature of humans and their political interminglings and the Abrahamic religions are far from the first to conflict with others - pagans and polytheists have absolutely no room to talk, they've warred a great deal too such that carnality is almost universal among them. Atheists are difficult to categorize because of their lack of a belief, but I think that to be poor form because religion in my opinion is an extension of biology (which is why the bible is very particular about geneolgies), that member is replaced with corporate doctrine and tithes to a very wealthy web of kikes, I think you know where that shekel goes.

I think it's because they were the first to be co-opted (Christianity is in a way basically co-opting Judaism). I also think a trick many philosemites in Christianity pulled was to insert one or two passages about the "synagogue of satan" to appeal to gentiles (who are naturally suspicious of jews) and try to make it seem like passages in the Old Testament where jews were scolded seem suspicious of jews, when really in the context, the jews were only being scolded because they either didn't simply accept Jesus as the Messiah or because they did not turn to Yahweh and lusted after "false" polytheistic gods.

By the example of one prominent jewish scholar (Gershom Scholem) there are three stages of a religion; the primal, the distance between oneself and the sublime, and the bridge that connects - jews haven't been able to do this because their beliefs are ornamental, their covenant is dead according to Christianity and everything that has happened since has shown that worldly circumstance has been aggressive towards them as they take on these other gods, namely the manifestation of money to whom children are gleefully sacrificed. We know them by their fruits.

What I go off of primarily is how they act now when they're afraid of something.

Many Americans have always unknowingly mixed non Biblical superstition with their Christian beliefs. I don't care if Obama said it, when he said America was never a Christian religion, I think he was just speaking of what was. America was never a Christian theocracy, and when most people try to claim America was a Christian nation, that's why they try to imply, that it closely followed the word of god.

Perhaps not. The only people who follow the word anywhere near what is baseline demanded are the Amish and the Mennonites.

There's already a way to go about that: just be religious but not spiritual. There is plenty of support for this even in the comparatively short <300 years of American history. Thomas Jefferson didn't necessary like Christianity. The Founding Fathers were theistic rationalists, not "Christian Nationalists" like some in the media are trying to meme into existence.

I think a theistic rationalist or a deist is a fair assessment for anyone. I simply live my own truth as it has been shown to me.

Abrahamic religion compare to other religions is good for enforcing monogamy, that's another reason why so many guys that can't lock down women like it and why nazis (who supported racial eugenics and definitely believed not everyone should breed) were also against it, portraying Abrahamic religion as a dysgenic force.

I think Islam does it better, and if it weren't for such wavering beliefs in the nuclear family and if the world permitted that we exchange daughters and married before whoredom sets in, then things would be manageable. Should everyone marry? Perhaps not, I don't think that's a new thought either. Nevertheless I think the old American system worked well enough, boundaries were intact and respectability within the household meant you avoided marrying a dysgenic shitbag, but then every institution got infiltrated. Even Hitler and the might of the third reich couldn't save mother Europa from that same fate.

Abrahamic religion has done a lot of a damage to the world and atheists, pagans and polytheists have been right about that. Support for funding the state of Israel no matter what wouldn't exist if not for Judaism and Christianity. Islamic terror wouldn't occur if the basis hadn't been laid with the prior foundations of Christianity and Judaism, which Islam borrows heavily from and which justified a lot of messed up things through supposed revelation from angels, something other religions didn't focus so much on.

I think this would have happened one way or the other given the nature of humans and their political interminglings and the Abrahamic religions are far from the first to conflict with others - pagans and polytheists have absolutely no room to talk, they've warred a great deal too such that carnality is almost universal among them. Atheists are difficult to categorize because of their lack of a belief, but I think that to be poor form because religion in my opinion is an extension of biology, that member is replaced with corporate doctrine and tithes to a very wealthy web of kikes, I think you know where that shekel goes.

I think it's because they were the first to be co-opted (Christianity is in a way basically co-opting Judaism). I also think a trick many philosemites in Christianity pulled was to insert one or two passages about the "synagogue of satan" to appeal to gentiles (who are naturally suspicious of jews) and try to make it seem like passages in the Old Testament where jews were scolded seem suspicious of jews, when really in the context, the jews were only being scolded because they either didn't simply accept Jesus as the Messiah or because they did not turn to Yahweh and lusted after "false" polytheistic gods.

By the example of one prominent jewish scholar (Gershom Scholem) there are three stages of a religion; the primal, the distance between oneself and the sublime, and the bridge that connects - jews haven't been able to do this because their beliefs are ornamental, their covenant is dead according to Christianity and everything that has happened since has shown that worldly circumstance has been aggressive towards them as they take on these other gods, namely the manifestation of money to whom children are gleefully sacrificed. We know them by their fruits.

What I go off of primarily is how they act now when they're afraid of something.

Many Americans have always unknowingly mixed non Biblical superstition with their Christian beliefs. I don't care if Obama said it, when he said America was never a Christian religion, I think he was just speaking of what was. America was never a Christian theocracy, and when most people try to claim America was a Christian nation, that's why they try to imply, that it closely followed the word of god.

Perhaps not. The only people who follow the word anywhere near what is baseline demanded are the Amish and the Mennonites.

There's already a way to go about that: just be religious but not spiritual. There is plenty of support for this even in the comparatively short <300 years of American history. Thomas Jefferson didn't necessary like Christianity. The Founding Fathers were theistic rationalists, not "Christian Nationalists" like some in the media are trying to meme into existence.

I think a theistic rationalist or a deist is a fair assessment for anyone. I simply live my own truth as it has been shown to me.

Abrahamic religion compare to other religions is good for enforcing monogamy, that's another reason why so many guys that can't lock down women like it and why nazis (who supported racial eugenics and definitely believed not everyone should breed) were also against it, portraying Abrahamic religion as a dysgenic force.

I think Islam does it better, and if it weren't for such wavering beliefs in the nuclear family and if the world permitted that we exchange daughters and married before whoredom sets in, then things would be manageable. Should everyone marry? Perhaps not, I don't think that's a new thought either. Nevertheless I think the old American system worked well enough, boundaries were intact and respectability within the household meant you avoided marrying a dysgenic shitbag, but then every institution got infiltrated. Even Hitler and the might of the third reich couldn't save mother Europa from that same fate.

Abrahamic religion has done a lot of a damage to the world and atheists, pagans and polytheists have been right about that. Support for funding the state of Israel no matter what wouldn't exist if not for Judaism and Christianity. Islamic terror wouldn't occur if the basis hadn't been laid with the prior foundations of Christianity and Judaism, which Islam borrows heavily from and which justified a lot of messed up things through supposed revelation from angels, something other religions didn't focus so much on.

I think this would have happened one way or the other given the nature of humans and their political interminglings and the Abrahamic religions are far from the first to conflict with others - pagans and polytheists have absolutely no room to talk, they've warred a great deal too such that carnality is almost universal among them. Atheists are difficult to categorize because of their lack of a belief, but I think that to be poor form because religion in my opinion is an extension of biology, that member is replaced with corporate doctrine and tithes to a very wealthy web of kikes, I think you know where that shekel goes.

I think it's because they were the first to be co-opted (Christianity is in a way basically co-opting Judaism). I also think a trick many philosemites in Christianity pulled was to insert one or two passages about the "synagogue of satan" to appeal to gentiles (who are naturally suspicious of jews) and try to make it seem like passages in the Old Testament where jews were scolded seem suspicious of jews, when really in the context, the jews were only being scolded because they either didn't simply accept Jesus as the Messiah or because they did not turn to Yahweh and lusted after "false" polytheistic gods.

By the example of one prominent jewish scholar (Gershom Scholem) there are three stages of a religion; the primal, the distance between oneself and the sublime, and the bridge that connects - jews haven't been able to do this because their beliefs are ornamental, their covenant is dead according to Christianity and everything that has happened since has shown that worldly circumstance has been aggressive towards them as they take on these other gods, namely the manifestation of money to whom children are gleefully sacrificed. We know them by their fruits.

What I go off of primarily is how they act now when they're afraid of something.

Many Americans have always unknowingly mixed non Biblical superstition with their Christian beliefs. I don't care if Obama said it, when he said America was never a Christian religion, I think he was just speaking of what was. America was never a Christian theocracy, and when most people try to claim America was a Christian nation, that's why they try to imply, that it closely followed the word of god.

Perhaps not. The only people who follow the word anywhere near what is baseline demanded are the Amish and the Mennonites.

There's already a way to go about that: just be religious but not spiritual. There is plenty of support for this even in the comparatively short <300 years of American history. Thomas Jefferson didn't necessary like Christianity. The Founding Fathers were theistic rationalists, not "Christian Nationalists" like some in the media are trying to meme into existence.

I think a theistic rationalist or a deist is a fair assessment for anyone. I simply live my own truth as it has been shown.

Abrahamic religion compare to other religions is good for enforcing monogamy, that's another reason why so many guys that can't lock down women like it and why nazis (who supported racial eugenics and definitely believed not everyone should breed) were also against it, portraying Abrahamic religion as a dysgenic force.

I think Islam does it better, and if it weren't for such wavering beliefs in the nuclear family and if the world permitted that we exchange daughters and married before whoredom sets in, then things would be manageable. Should everyone marry? Perhaps not, I don't think that's a new thought either. Nevertheless I think the old American system worked well enough, boundaries were intact and respectability within the household meant you avoided marrying a dysgenic shitbag, but then every institution got infiltrated. Even Hitler and the might of the third reich couldn't save mother Europa from that same fate.

Abrahamic religion has done a lot of a damage to the world and atheists, pagans and polytheists have been right about that. Support for funding the state of Israel no matter what wouldn't exist if not for Judaism and Christianity. Islamic terror wouldn't occur if the basis hadn't been laid with the prior foundations of Christianity and Judaism, which Islam borrows heavily from and which justified a lot of messed up things through supposed revelation from angels, something other religions didn't focus so much on.

I think this would have happened one way or the other given the nature of humans and their political interminglings and the Abrahamic religions are far from the first to conflict with others - pagans and polytheists have absolutely no room to talk, they've warred a great deal too such that carnality is almost universal among them. Atheists are difficult to categorize because of their lack of a belief, but I think that to be poor form because religion in my opinion is an extension of biology, that member is replaced with corporate doctrine and tithes to a very wealthy web of kikes, I think you know where that shekel goes.

I think it's because they were the first to be co-opted (Christianity is in a way basically co-opting Judaism). I also think a trick many philosemites in Christianity pulled was to insert one or two passages about the "synagogue of satan" to appeal to gentiles (who are naturally suspicious of jews) and try to make it seem like passages in the Old Testament where jews were scolded seem suspicious of jews, when really in the context, the jews were only being scolded because they either didn't simply accept Jesus as the Messiah or because they did not turn to Yahweh and lusted after "false" polytheistic gods.

By the example of one prominent jewish scholar (Gershom Scholem) there are three stages of a religion; the primal, the distance between oneself and the sublime, and the bridge that connects - jews haven't been able to do this because their beliefs are ornamental, their covenant is dead according to Christianity and everything that has happened since has shown that worldly circumstance has been aggressive towards them as they take on these other gods, namely the manifestation of money to whom children are gleefully sacrificed. We know them by their fruits.

What I go off of primarily is how they act now when they're afraid of something.

Many Americans have always unknowingly mixed non Biblical superstition with their Christian beliefs. I don't care if Obama said it, when he said America was never a Christian religion, I think he was just speaking of what was. America was never a Christian theocracy, and when most people try to claim America was a Christian nation, that's why they try to imply, that it closely followed the word of god.

Perhaps not. The only people who follow the word anywhere near what is baseline demanded are the Amish and the Mennonites.

There's already a way to go about that: just be religious but not spiritual. There is plenty of support for this even in the comparatively short <300 years of American history. Thomas Jefferson didn't necessary like Christianity. The Founding Fathers were theistic rationalists, not "Christian Nationalists" like some in the media are trying to meme into existence.

I think a theistic rationalist or a deist is a fair assessment for anyone. I simply live my own truth.

Abrahamic religion compare to other religions is good for enforcing monogamy, that's another reason why so many guys that can't lock down women like it and why nazis (who supported racial eugenics and definitely believed not everyone should breed) were also against it, portraying Abrahamic religion as a dysgenic force.

I think Islam does it better, and if it weren't for such wavering beliefs in the nuclear family and if the world permitted that we exchange daughters and married before whoredom sets in, then things would be manageable. Should everyone marry? Perhaps not, I don't think that's a new thought either. Nevertheless I think the old American system worked well enough, boundaries were intact and respectability within the household meant you avoided marrying a dysgenic shitbag, but then every institution got infiltrated. Even Hitler and the might of the third reich couldn't save mother Europa from that same fate.

Abrahamic religion has done a lot of a damage to the world and atheists, pagans and polytheists have been right about that. Support for funding the state of Israel no matter what wouldn't exist if not for Judaism and Christianity. Islamic terror wouldn't occur if the basis hadn't been laid with the prior foundations of Christianity and Judaism, which Islam borrows heavily from and which justified a lot of messed up things through supposed revelation from angels, something other religions didn't focus so much on.

I think this would have happened one way or the other given the nature of humans and their political interminglings and the Abrahamic religions are far from the first to conflict with others - pagans and polytheists have absolutely no room to talk, they've warred a great deal too such that carnality is almost universal among them. Atheists are difficult to categorize because of their lack of a belief, but I think that to be poor form because religion in my opinion is an extension of biology, that member is replaced with corporate doctrine and tithes to a very wealthy web of kikes, I think you know where that shekel goes.

I think it's because they were the first to be co-opted (Christianity is in a way basically co-opting Judaism). I also think a trick many philosemites in Christianity pulled was to insert one or two passages about the "synagogue of satan" to appeal to gentiles (who are naturally suspicious of jews) and try to make it seem like passages in the Old Testament where jews were scolded seem suspicious of jews, when really in the context, the jews were only being scolded because they either didn't simply accept Jesus as the Messiah or because they did not turn to Yahweh and lusted after "false" polytheistic gods.

By the example of one prominent jewish scholar (Gershom Scholem) there are stages of a religion; the primal, the distance between oneself and the sublime, and the bridge that connects - jews haven't been able to do this because their beliefs are ornamental, their covenant is dead according to Christianity and everything that has happened since has shown that worldly circumstance has been aggressive towards them as they take on these other gods, namely the manifestation of money to whom children are gleefully sacrificed. We know them by their fruits.

What I go off of primarily is how they act now when they're afraid of something.

Many Americans have always unknowingly mixed non Biblical superstition with their Christian beliefs. I don't care if Obama said it, when he said America was never a Christian religion, I think he was just speaking of what was. America was never a Christian theocracy, and when most people try to claim America was a Christian nation, that's why they try to imply, that it closely followed the word of god.

Perhaps not. The only people who follow the word anywhere near what is baseline demanded are the Amish and the Mennonites.

There's already a way to go about that: just be religious but not spiritual. There is plenty of support for this even in the comparatively short <300 years of American history. Thomas Jefferson didn't necessary like Christianity. The Founding Fathers were theistic rationalists, not "Christian Nationalists" like some in the media are trying to meme into existence.

I think a theistic rationalist or a deist is a fair assessment for anyone. I simply live my own truth.

Abrahamic religion compare to other religions is good for enforcing monogamy, that's another reason why so many guys that can't lock down women like it and why nazis (who supported racial eugenics and definitely believed not everyone should breed) were also against it, portraying Abrahamic religion as a dysgenic force.

I think Islam does it better, and if it weren't for such wavering beliefs in the nuclear family and if the world permitted that we exchange daughters and married before whoredom sets in, then things would be manageable. Should everyone marry? Perhaps not, I don't think that's a new thought either. Nevertheless I think the old American system worked well enough, boundaries were intact and respectability within the household meant you avoided marrying a dysgenic shitbag, but then every institution got infiltrated. Even Hitler and the might of the third reich couldn't save mother Europa from that same fate.

Abrahamic religion has done a lot of a damage to the world and atheists, pagans and polytheists have been right about that. Support for funding the state of Israel no matter what wouldn't exist if not for Judaism and Christianity. Islamic terror wouldn't occur if the basis hadn't been laid with the prior foundations of Christianity and Judaism, which Islam borrows heavily from and which justified a lot of messed up things through supposed revelation from angels, something other religions didn't focus so much on.

I think this would have happened one way or the other given the nature of humans and their political interminglings and the Abrahamic religions are far from the first to conflict with others - pagans and polytheists have absolutely no room to talk, they've warred a great deal too. Atheists are difficult to categorize because of their lack of a belief, but I think that to be poor form because religion in my opinion is an extension of biology, that member is replaced with corporate doctrine and tithes to a very wealthy web of kikes, I think you know where that shekel goes.

I think it's because they were the first to be co-opted (Christianity is in a way basically co-opting Judaism). I also think a trick many philosemites in Christianity pulled was to insert one or two passages about the "synagogue of satan" to appeal to gentiles (who are naturally suspicious of jews) and try to make it seem like passages in the Old Testament where jews were scolded seem suspicious of jews, when really in the context, the jews were only being scolded because they either didn't simply accept Jesus as the Messiah or because they did not turn to Yahweh and lusted after "false" polytheistic gods.

By the example of one prominent jewish scholar (Gershom Scholem) there are stages of a religion; the primal, the distance between oneself and the sublime, and the bridge that connects - jews haven't been able to do this because their beliefs are ornamental, their covenant is dead according to Christianity and everything that has happened since has shown that worldly circumstance has been aggressive towards them as they take on these other gods, namely the manifestation of money to whom children are gleefully sacrificed. We know them by their fruits.

What I go off of primarily is how they act now when they're afraid of something.

Many Americans have always unknowingly mixed non Biblical superstition with their Christian beliefs. I don't care if Obama said it, when he said America was never a Christian religion, I think he was just speaking of what was. America was never a Christian theocracy, and when most people try to claim America was a Christian nation, that's why they try to imply, that it closely followed the word of god.

Perhaps not. The only people who follow the word anywhere near what is baseline demanded are the Amish and the Mennonites.

There's already a way to go about that: just be religious but not spiritual. There is plenty of support for this even in the comparatively short <300 years of American history. Thomas Jefferson didn't necessary like Christianity. The Founding Fathers were theistic rationalists, not "Christian Nationalists" like some in the media are trying to meme into existence.

I think a theistic rationalist or a deist is a fair assessment for anyone. I simply live my own truth.