No laws mandate for less severe sentencing for women but it happens anyway. No laws say men should be less favoured in family courts but it happens anyway. Laws don't differentiate men and women, nor create simps, it's just a by-product of the very existence of men and women, which you can't legislate away.

Eradicating the legal concept of a man or a woman would not put men on an even footing, it would just make the hidden legal prejudice against men even harder to grasp. Do you really think they'd start playing fair because the law tells courts they have to be blind to sex? It would only elevate androgynous-looking people and incentivise more tranny madness.

Edit: as to your question, 'What are they going to sue you for?' you'd get sued for failing to treat women sex-agnostically under the law. The rules would suddenly be put in place again when used against you. They'd only be absent when you need them.

No laws mandate for less severe sentencing for women but it happens anyway. No laws say men should be less favoured in family courts but it happens anyway. Laws don't differentiate men and women, nor create simps, it's just a by-product of the very existence of men and women, which you can't legislate away.

Eradicating the legal concept of a man or a woman would not put men on an even footing, it would just make the legal prejudice against men even harder to grasp. Do you really think they'd start playing fair because the law tells courts they have to be blind to sex? It would only elevate androgynous-looking people and incentivise more tranny madness.

Edit: as to your question, 'What are they going to sue you for?' you'd get sued for failing to treat women sex-agnostically under the law. The rules would suddenly be put in place again when used against you. They'd only be absent when you need them.