if Roe v Wade never happened, do you think the country would have been able to handle having double the amount of black people it’s had since RvW, or no? It’s all rather interesting to me.

A total ban on abortion would have certainly accelerated the issues plaguing the country over the past 60 years. Thus, if I'm in an accelerationist mood, I'm for banning it. In reality, I'm not for bans on abortion (though there is no good reason to allow for them past the first trimester other than safety of the woman), but I'm also for the total and utter elimination of the welfare state, which would put a natural counterweight on the problem. Ideally, culture and communities would limit out-of-wedlock childbirth via shame and even explusion, due to the undue burdens it puts on extended families and communities. This is also why I'm opposed to Barrett's argument for a guarantee of adoptive services.

if Roe v Wade never happened, do you think the country would have been able to handle having double the amount of black people it’s had since RvW, or no? It’s all rather interesting to me.

A total ban on abortion would have certainly accelerated the issues plaguing the country over the past 60 years. Thus, if I'm in an accelerationist mood, I'm for banning it. In reality, I'm not for bans on abortion (though there is no good reason to allow for them past the first trimester other than safety of the woman), but I'm also for the total and utter elimination of the welfare state, which would put a natural counterweight on the problem. Ideally, culture and communities would limit out-of-wedlock childbirth via shame and even explusion, due to the undue burdens it puts on extended families and communities.