Because Ukrainians will gladly take such a cheap shot. Their entire tactic in this war has been cheap shots.
This did not stop NATO, America or any other western country in the past in recovering their wounded or lost behind enemy lines. In Vietnam America had the "Sandy". And They still do to this very day try to recover them. This is a major moral boost to the troops and pilots. They know that if they get shot down, and avoid capture by the enemy that they will be rescued.
Neither has Ukraine, they've been stashing weapons in residential areas and they've been hiding behind children to try and slow down Russian advances.
It doesn't make sense, considering a lot of the Ukrainians are normal people too. Especially that this tactic doesn't work for Russians. It would have worked for NATO and Israel for the most part(Biden bombing innocents at Afghanistan withdrawal, and Trump avoiding the bombing of innocents and calling off the attack. Israel calling and releasing leaflets to warn people). But not with Russia. If they do not care about their soldiers, their conscripts(they never did), they will care even less about people around them. If we used this logic, then Ukraine has more weapons than all countries combined to hide in all these civilian buildings: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/russian-state-tv-airs-shocking-aerial-footage-of-completely-destroyed-mariupol-host-blames-ukrainians-for-destruction/ and https://www.manilatimes.net/manilatimes/uploads/images/2022/03/23/57383.jpg
into the floor above once they encountered children
Is this the one where the Chechens were firing at the building?
Your mistake is believing that the US media isn't also government controlled.
For the most part, it isn't. America has Daily Wire, Daily Caller, Blaze, Fox, Newsmax, OAN, and others. What does Russia have? 99% is state controlled.
The problem I have is that support for Ukraine is universal among my enemy,
And this is what I have been saying here all the time. Just because the person you hate, your enemy chose not to go down that particular road does not mean, by obligation you have to take it.
Another example, if the person you hate chose not to jump down the cliff, does that mean you jump down the cliff?
No, it means you sit down, analyze the information and make a proper choice. Even if that choice aligns with your enemy. Because a broken clock is right twice a day. Just because it is broken, those particular times are going to be right. This is akin to that meme, Trump drinks water, and the NPC breaks down because he also drinks water. Or Hitler drank water, and the NPC drinks water too. So, does that mean, because your enemy drinks water, you have to stop drinking water?
You can check out this documentary, that got attacked in wikipedia for displaying the real facts of the soviets, communism and nazism. The stormcucks in kia2 are acting exactly like the nazis in 1939 and 1940, they are backing the soviets Russians. https://vimeo.com/69728873
if you want, I can try and find a better copy with subtitles so you can see the testimony of people who survived the Russian onslaught.
It is a mistake, a massive mistake to make excuses for Russia and siding with them because somebody you hate chose to stand with Ukraine.
Because Ukrainians will gladly take such a cheap shot. Their entire tactic in this war has been cheap shots.
This did not stop NATO, America or any other western country in the past in recovering their wounded or lost behind enemy lines. In Vietnam America had the "Sandy". And They still do to this very day try to recover them. This is a major moral boost to the troops and pilots. They know that if they get shot down, and avoid capture by the enemy that they will be rescued.
Neither has Ukraine, they've been stashing weapons in residential areas and they've been hiding behind children to try and slow down Russian advances.
It doesn't make sense, considering a lot of the Ukrainians are normal people too. Especially that this tactic doesn't work for Russians. It would have worked for NATO and Israel for the most part(Biden bombing innocents at Afghanistan withdrawal, and Trump avoiding the bombing of innocents and calling off the attack. Israel calling and releasing leaflets to warn people). But not with Russia. If they do not care about their soldiers, their conscripts(they never did), they will care even less about people around them. If we used this logic, then Ukraine has more weapons than all countries combined to hide in all these civilian buildings: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/russian-state-tv-airs-shocking-aerial-footage-of-completely-destroyed-mariupol-host-blames-ukrainians-for-destruction/ and https://www.manilatimes.net/manilatimes/uploads/images/2022/03/23/57383.jpg
into the floor above once they encountered children
Is this the one where the Chechens were firing at the building?
Your mistake is believing that the US media isn't also government controlled.
For the most part, it isn't. America has Daily Wire, Daily Caller, Blaze, Fox, Newsmax, OAN, and others. What does Russia have? 99% is state controlled.
The problem I have is that support for Ukraine is universal among my enemy,
And this is what I have been saying here all the time. Just because the person you hate, your enemy chose not to go down that particular road does not mean, by obligation you have to take it.
Another example, if the person you hate chose not to jump down the cliff, does that mean you jump down the cliff?
No, it means you sit down, analyze the information and make a proper choice. Even if that choice aligns with your enemy. Because a broken clock is right twice a day. Just because it is broken, those particular times are going to be right. This is akin to that meme, Trump drinks water, and the NPC breaks down because he also drinks water. Or Hitler drank water, and the NPC drinks water too. So, does that mean, because your enemy drinks water, you have to stop drinking water?
You can check out this documentary, that got attacked in wikipedia for displaying the real facts of the soviets, communism and nazism. The stormcucks in kia2 are acting exactly like the nazis in 1939 and 1940, they are backing the soviets Russians. https://vimeo.com/69728873
if you want, I can try and find a better copy with subtitles so you can see the testimony of people who survived the Russian onslaught.
It is a mistake, a massive mistake to make excuses for Russia and siding with them because somebody you hate chose to stand with Russia.