I think he got banned for this comment in his thread:
I disagree. I think harming others is their main priority. If they cared how they were perceived, they wouldn't be calling for mass murder.
You're kind of close here. They join causes that are popular, yes. But they do that to exploit those causes to advance feminism.
Sadistic, inexcusable and attacking babies. I'm surprised they don't already do it.
On the one hand I see the point that painting others as "the group that's trying to kill you" is a problem.
On the other hand, I just ran across another feminist saying basically the same thing about men who didn't match their sexual preferences today, so is it stopping hate groups or is protecting the main hate group from competition?
I disagree, I think he got banned for this comment in his thread:
I disagree. I think harming others is their main priority. If they cared how they were perceived, they wouldn't be calling for mass murder.
You're kind of close here. They join causes that are popular, yes. But they do that to exploit those causes to advance feminism.
Sadistic, inexcusable and attacking babies. I'm surprised they don't already do it.
On the one hand I see the point that painting others as "the group that's trying to kill you" is a problem.
On the other hand, I just ran across another feminist saying basically the same thing about men who didn't match their sexual preferences today, so is it stopping hate groups or is protecting the main hate group from competition?