Not even the modern evolutionary scientist community actually agrees. They recently had a whole thing trying to figure out a new theory even because there are too many problems with the current theory. I am not saying here it isn't true or claiming that, but you are way off the wild end on it and clearly someone who has not actually followed where the real science is. You live in the realm of pop science, not where the real evolutionary scientists even stand [who are people who DO support that]. It is ok though, most people don't realize the massive chasm in evolutionary science between pop science you see in news/magazines/books/everywhere vs the actual peer reviewed literature of current evolutionary biology where the actual scientists currently working through the theories and ideas are.

Not even the modern evolutionary scientist community actually agrees. They recently had a whole thing trying to figure out a new theory even because there are too many problems with the current theory. I am not saying here it isn't true or claiming that, but you are way off the wild end on it and clearly someone who has not actually followed where the real science is. You live in the realm of pop science, not where the real evolutionary scientists even stand [who are people who DO support that]

Not even the modern evolutionary scientist community actually agrees. They recently had a whole thing trying to figure out a new theory even because there are too many problems with the current theory. I am not saying here it isn't true or claiming that, but you are way off the wild end on it and clearly someone who has not actually followed where the real science is. You seem more like mr. pop science.