Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

This seems like that "accuse others of doing that which you are already doing" thing.

It's not exactly wrong:

I'm saying that Imp specifically is a propagandist and uses women's fallibility to lend credence to his cause. He doesn't just hate women, he's a woman hating cartoon character. It doesn't matter what his group of choice is, he argues unreasonably for a specific end.

Because he's using feminists tactics:

I'm saying that feminists are propagandists and uses men's fallibility to lend credence to their cause. They don't just hate men, they're a man hating cartoon character. It doesn't matter what his group of choice is, they argues unreasonably for a specific end.

Take a look at the rebbit feminism sub front page:

  • men talk to my male friend/partner first instead of me (men annoying)
  • a lot of men think rape can be funny or fun (men bad and inherently evil)
  • trying to blame-shift "toxic masculinity" to "we decided it's bad so it must have been invented by men (mra's)" (blame the victim basically)
  • I went to the beach in bagladesh and here's a bunch of men staring at me (men threatening)
  • We found a case on another continent where men committed a nasty sounding crime against a woman...that's why you need to continue psychologically destroying the men around you
  • Exact headline: "It's 2021 and women are still not considered humans (by men) socially, politically & legally" (hysterically inaccurate claims in order to push attacking and hating men)

Yeah, theimpossible 1 acts like a milder version of a feminist.

The reason they don't like theimpossible1 is because the thing they hate the most, is someone treating them, like they treat other people.

If we could ban all feminists and also anti-feminist stuff that would be my ideal. This whole thing is a huge shitshow.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

This seems like that "accuse others of doing that which you are already doing" thing.

It's not exactly wrong:

I'm saying that Imp specifically is a propagandist and uses women's fallibility to lend credence to his cause. He doesn't just hate women, he's a woman hating cartoon character. It doesn't matter what his group of choice is, he argues unreasonably for a specific end.

Because he's using feminists tactics:

I'm saying that feminists are propagandists and uses men's fallibility to lend credence to their cause. They don't just hate men, they're a man hating cartoon character. It doesn't matter what his group of choice is, they argues unreasonably for a specific end.

Take a look at the rebbit feminism sub front page:

  • men talk to my male friend/partner first instead of me (men annoying)
  • a lot of men think rape can be funny or fun (men bad and inherently evil)
  • trying to blame-shift "toxic masculinity" to "we decided it's bad so it must have been invented by men (mra's)" (blame the victim basically)
  • I went to the beach in bagladesh and here's a bunch of men staring at me (men threatening)
  • We found a case on another continent where men committed a nasty sounding crime against a woman...that's why you need to continue psychologically destroying the men around you
  • Exact headline: "It's 2021 and women are still not considered humans (by men) socially, politically & legally" (hysterically inaccurate claims in order to push attacking and hating men)

Yeah, theimpossible 1 acts like a milder version of a feminist.

The reason they don't like theimpossible1 is because the thing they hate the most, is someone treating them, like they treat other people.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

This seems like that "accuse others of doing that which you are already doing" thing.

It's not exactly wrong:

I'm saying that Imp specifically is a propagandist and uses women's fallibility to lend credence to his cause. He doesn't just hate women, he's a woman hating cartoon character. It doesn't matter what his group of choice is, he argues unreasonably for a specific end.
: Because he's using feminists tactics:

I'm saying that feminists are propagandists and uses men's fallibility to lend credence to their cause. They don't just hate men, they're a man hating cartoon character. It doesn't matter what his group of choice is, they argues unreasonably for a specific end.

Take a look at the rebbit feminism sub front page:

  • men talk to my male friend/partner first instead of me (men annoying)
  • a lot of men think rape can be funny or fun (men bad and inherently evil)
  • trying to blame-shift "toxic masculinity" to "we decided it's bad so it must have been invented by men (mra's)" (blame the victim basically)
  • I went to the beach in bagladesh and here's a bunch of men staring at me (men threatening)
  • We found a case on another continent where men committed a nasty sounding crime against a woman...that's why you need to continue psychologically destroying the men around you
  • Exact headline: "It's 2021 and women are still not considered humans (by men) socially, politically & legally" (hysterically inaccurate claims in order to push attacking and hating men)

Yeah, theimpossible 1 acts like a milder version of a feminist.

The reason they don't like theimpossible1 is because the thing they hate the most, is someone treating them, like they treat other people.

3 years ago
1 score