Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

If you're going to make a propaganda piece, it would be more effective to leave out the women in front of the camera, only keeping those behind it, to appeal to the innate male instinct to protect the women of their tribe.

Bonus points for including any Jews, no matter how tenuously involved, with the production of any interracial porn, for the same reason.

You gained a point with the Goldstein quote, and lost it again with the Foxman quote. Each would have been appropriate in a distinct kind of propaganda image, but shown adjacent they more than cancel each other out.

Pointing out that Jenna Jameson converted to Judaism (the religion) in an image primarily focusing on atheist ethnic Jews also detracts - more so if one is aware that her conversion marked the end of her 'career' as a pornographer.

I give this post a 3/10 for propaganda value. Unconvincing and inefficient. In fact, I've been slightly persuaded in the opposite direction due to the sheer incompetence of your post. It neither serves as a tongue-in-cheek false-positive 'celebration' of 'Jewish Contributions' to porn, nor as an outright indictment of the same. I had already believed that the production of pornography as a commercial enterprise was primarily an atheist activity, and after reading the propographic, remain convinced of that fact.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

If you're going to make a propaganda piece, it would be more effective to leave out the women in front of the camera, only keeping those behind it, to appeal to the innate male instinct to protect the women of their tribe.

Bonus points for including any Jews, no matter how tenuously involved, with the production of any interracial porn, for the same reason.

I give this post a 3/10 for propaganda value. Unconvincing and inefficient. In fact, I've been slightly persuaded in the opposite direction due to the sheer incompetence of your post.

3 years ago
1 score